mirror of
https://github.com/github/spec-kit.git
synced 2026-08-03 06:26:30 +08:00
Addresses 5 Copilot review findings on HEAD b8269c8, all centered on
transaction integrity around workflow install/remove/registry writes,
following the atomic_write_json pattern already used in _utils.py:
1. WorkflowRegistry.save() now preserves the existing registry file's
mode (e.g. 0640/0644) across a save instead of silently downgrading
it to mkstemp's 0600 default; a brand-new registry still gets the
secure 0600 default.
2. workflow_remove now stages the install directory out of the way via
an atomic rename *before* the registry write, rather than deleting
it directly with shutil.rmtree after the registry already claims it
removed. This closes a real data-integrity gap: a partially-failed
rmtree could no longer leave a damaged directory re-marked
"installed" by the old manual restore-after-rmtree-failure code
(now deleted -- it's structurally impossible to need it). A
registry-write failure renames the staged directory back
(guarded, with an explicit warning if the restore-back rename
itself fails); a registry-write success is durable, so a later
failure to delete the staged directory is now a warning (exit 0),
not a contradictory "Error: Failed to remove" (exit 1) that used to
claim failure while the registry already recorded success.
3. Local (--dev/--from/plain path) and catalog install/reinstall now
write new content to a same-directory staging file and commit it
onto the destination workflow.yml via a single atomic swap, instead
of writing/downloading directly into the destination file. A prior
file (reinstall) is renamed aside rather than overwritten in place,
so it can be restored via rename -- never a content rewrite -- if
registry.add() subsequently fails; a rollback failure is now
explicitly reported as a warning instead of escaping unguarded and
masking the original clean error. This also removes the need to
read the prior file's bytes into memory before installing (that
read-before-write step and its failure mode are now unreachable),
and both local and catalog installs share the same four small
helpers (_stage_workflow_file / _commit_workflow_file /
_discard_staged_workflow_file / _rollback_committed_workflow_file,
plus guarded wrappers) rather than duplicating the logic.
4. Updated a stale comment (workflow_run's ownership-guard rationale)
that still described WorkflowRegistry._load() as silently
substituting an empty registry; it now fails closed by raising
OSError, which the comment now states plainly.
Tests: rewrote the two workflow_remove tests whose assertions encoded
the old (incoherent) rmtree-then-restore contract to instead prove the
new stage-then-commit contract (post-registry-success cleanup failure
is a warning+exit 0; pre-registry-success stage-restore failure is
guarded and escapes markup correctly). Rewrote the local/catalog
"backup read failure" tests, which tested a step the new design no
longer performs, into "restore-rename failure" tests proving the new
guarded rollback boundary. Added registry file-mode preservation tests.
All other existing install/remove/reinstall tests (save-failure
cleanup, pre-existing-empty-dir handling, early-failure-during-
reinstall parametrized cases, Rich markup escaping) continue to pass
unmodified against the new implementation.
Verified via GraphQL that all 5 threads are current (not outdated/
resolved) before fixing. Full suite: 3996 passed, 110 skipped. Ruff
clean on all touched files.
Assisted-by: GitHub Copilot (model: Claude Sonnet 5, autonomous)
Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>