mirror of
https://github.com/github/spec-kit.git
synced 2026-08-03 06:26:30 +08:00
57cc518d63
* fix(workflows): reject bool/.inf catalog priority in workflow & step catalog loaders
The WorkflowRegistry and StepRegistry catalog-config loaders coerced priority
with int() inside except (TypeError, ValueError), missing two guards the base
CatalogStackBase loader already has:
- bool is an int subclass, so 'priority: true' was silently coerced to 1;
- int(float('inf')) raises OverflowError (not caught), so 'priority: .inf'
crashed with an uncaught traceback.
Add the explicit bool check and OverflowError to both loaders, and add
OverflowError to the two _coerce_priority helpers used by 'catalog add' (they
return 0 on an uncoercible existing priority instead of crashing).
Parametrized tests on both TestWorkflowCatalog and TestStepCatalog reject
priority true/false/.inf (fail before: bool coerced to 1 / inf OverflowError).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
* test(workflows): cover add_catalog() OverflowError fallback for existing priority: .inf
The workflow/step catalog priority guards added OverflowError to _coerce_priority
(the 'catalog add' fallback), but the tests only exercised get_active_catalogs().
Add tests that prewrite an existing 'priority: .inf' entry and call add_catalog()
for both WorkflowCatalog and StepCatalog, asserting the command succeeds and the
new entry gets a valid priority (inf coerced to 0, +1). Fails before: int(inf)
OverflowError crashed add_catalog.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>