Files
github-spec-kit/tests
Ali jawwad 993083405e fix(init): don't block on confirmation for 'init --here' without a TTY (#3236)
* fix(init): don't block on confirmation for 'init --here' without a TTY

When 'specify init --here' targets a non-empty directory without --force, it called typer.confirm() unconditionally. In a non-interactive session (no TTY -- CI, piped, agent) there is no input, so the prompt reads EOF and aborts unhelpfully (or blocks), with no actionable message. The named-project path already fails fast and points to --force; --here was the inconsistent outlier.

Guard the confirmation with the existing _stdin_is_interactive() helper: when non-interactive, print a clear 'directory not empty; re-run with --force' error and exit 1 instead of prompting.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix(init): honor piped confirmation for 'init --here'; only fail-fast on empty stdin

The first version of this fix short-circuited on '_stdin_is_interactive()' (isatty) before typer.confirm, which broke 'init --here' when confirmation is piped (e.g. 'echo y | specify init --here' / CliRunner input='y\n') -- a non-TTY pipe with valid input was wrongly rejected, regressing test_init_here_without_force_preserves_shared_infra. Instead, call typer.confirm normally (piped 'y'/'n' is honored) and catch the Abort/EOFError it raises only when stdin is empty, converting that to the actionable '--force' guidance. This keeps the UX win for the no-input case without rejecting piped input.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix(init): distinguish interactive cancel from no-input; defer merge warning

Address Copilot review on the --here non-empty path: (1) treat typer.Abort during an interactive confirm (e.g. Ctrl+C) as a normal cancellation (exit 0), and only emit the '--force' guidance + exit 1 when there is no TTY (empty stdin / EOF) -- no longer conflating the two; (2) move the 'will be merged / may overwrite' warning so it only shows when actually proceeding (force) or folded into the confirmation prompt, not on the fail-fast path where nothing is merged.

Piped confirmation (e.g. 'echo y | specify init --here') is still honored, which is why the prompt is attempted rather than refused outright when non-interactive -- the existing test_init_here_without_force_preserves_shared_infra pipes 'y' and must succeed.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix(init): fail fast on non-interactive --here instead of prompting

Per Copilot review: do not call typer.confirm when stdin is not a TTY -- an open-but-idle non-TTY stdin (CI/agent) could block on the prompt. When the directory is non-empty and --force is not given, fail fast with '--force' guidance unless an interactive terminal is present. Interactive confirm still offers the merge-but-preserve path (distinct from --force, which overwrites); a Ctrl+C there is treated as a normal cancellation (exit 0). The merge/overwrite warning is only printed when actually proceeding, not on the fail-fast path.

Updated the preserve-merge E2E test to simulate an interactive terminal so it exercises the confirm path (non-interactive sessions now require --force).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix(init): honor piped y/n for 'init --here', error only on no-input

Per maintainer review: restore the second-revision shape. Calling
typer.confirm normally keeps 'echo y | specify init --here' reaching the
non-destructive preserve-merge path (and piped 'n' cancels with exit 0).
Only when no confirmation input is available at all (closed/empty stdin
-> typer.Abort/EOFError) is it converted into the actionable error that
points at --force. This drops the _stdin_is_interactive fail-fast that
broke the common piped-confirm idiom and made preserve-merge
interactive-only. The preserve test no longer needs to monkeypatch
_stdin_is_interactive - it passes on the real contract.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix(init): preserve interactive-cancel semantics; fold merge risk into the prompt

Two review-driven refinements to the 'init --here' non-empty confirm, keeping
the maintainer-endorsed control flow (piped y/n honored; non-interactive EOF →
actionable --force error):

1. typer.confirm raises typer.Abort for BOTH an interactive Ctrl+C and an EOF on
   closed/empty stdin. Catching it unconditionally reported 'no confirmation
   input available, use --force' and exited 1 even when the user cancelled at a
   real TTY. Branch on _stdin_is_interactive(): a TTY cancel is a normal exit 0
   ('Operation cancelled'); only non-interactive EOF becomes the --force error.

2. Fold the merge-risk warning into the confirmation question instead of printing
   it unconditionally beforehand, so the EOF/no-input path (which exits without
   changing anything) no longer prints a misleading 'will be merged' line first.

Adds test_init_here_interactive_cancel_exits_zero (fails before: exit 1 with
--force; passes after: exit 0, 'cancelled', pre-existing file untouched). The
non-interactive EOF and piped-y preserve-merge tests are unchanged and still pass.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-13 15:29:15 -05:00
..