* feat(scripts): port create-new-feature, setup-plan and setup-tasks to Python Ports the three core workflow scripts to Python as part of #3280, following the check-prerequisites PoC pattern from #3302. Adds resolve_template() to the shared common.py module and parity tests that run bash and Python side by side. Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> * fix(tests): treat only None env as unset in parity run helper Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> * fix(scripts): fall back to directory scan on any registry error, skip hidden preset dirs Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> * feat(templates): add py: lines for setup_plan and setup_tasks Ships with the scripts they reference; the remaining templates got their py: lines in #3403. Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> * fix: support py variant in skills placeholder resolver resolve_skill_placeholders only accepted sh/ps, so a py init option fell into the fallback path and {SCRIPT} rendered without an interpreter prefix. Accept py and prefix the resolved interpreter, matching process_template. Also guard ps_cmd against a missing PowerShell with a clear assert. Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> * test: pin clean-error behavior for invalid --number Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> * docs(scripts): reword unused-arg comment to match implementation The loop accepts and silently ignores extra positional args (it doesn't build a collected list); match the wording to what the code and setup-plan.sh actually do. Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> * fix: fall back when configured script variant is missing from frontmatter Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> * fix(scripts): reject signed/whitespace --number values to match bash 10# parity The bash twin uses $((10#$BRANCH_NUMBER)), which rejects signed and whitespace-padded values. Python's int() accepted them (e.g. -1), producing a malformed -01-... prefix that sequential scans ignore. Restrict --number to unsigned decimal digits before conversion, and pin the parity with a bash-comparison test. Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> * fix(scripts): complete Python port installation Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> * fix(integrations): fall back for missing script variants Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> * test: make Python script checks platform-aware Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> * fix Windows Python command invocation parity Use PowerShell's call operator for spaced Python interpreter paths and align setup-tasks missing-template errors across script variants. Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> * fix(scripts): preserve cross-platform Python parity Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> * fix: reject signed PowerShell feature numbers Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> * fix(scripts): align feature number range Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> * fix(scripts): reject exhausted feature numbers Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> * fix(scripts): complete create feature parity Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> * fix(scripts): align create feature outputs Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> * fix(scripts): harden cross-platform parity Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> * fix(scripts): keep truncation JSON clean Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> * fix(scripts): align setup failure parity Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> * fix(scripts): close parity edge cases Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> * fix(scripts): propagate PowerShell setup errors Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> * fix(scripts): harden fallback resolution Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> * fix(scripts): stabilize PowerShell fallbacks Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> * fix(scripts): complete setup-plan parity Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> * fix(cli): require runnable script fallbacks Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> * fix(cli): preserve shell fallback without preference Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> * fix(scripts): restore help and symlink parity - setup-tasks.ps1: check -Help before unknown-argument validation so '-Help --bogus' exits 0 like the Bash/Python variants - common.py: strip the repo root prefix lexically in persist_feature_json instead of resolve(), so a symlinked specs/ still persists the relative 'specs/NNN-name' path the Bash/PowerShell helpers store Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> * fix(scripts): align persist-hint quoting with shlex.quote - create-new-feature.sh: replace printf %q with a shell_quote helper that emits shlex.quote-identical output, so the persistence hints stay byte-identical between the Bash and Python variants (printf %q output also varies between bash versions) - promote the negative --number test to an all-variants parity test now that Bash and PowerShell reject signed values consistently - add a spaced-repo-path parity test for the persistence hints Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> --------- Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
10 KiB
description, handoffs, scripts
| description | handoffs | scripts | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Generate an actionable, dependency-ordered tasks.md for the feature based on available design artifacts. |
|
|
User Input
$ARGUMENTS
You MUST consider the user input before proceeding (if not empty).
Pre-Execution Checks
Check for extension hooks (before tasks generation):
- Check if
.specify/extensions.ymlexists in the project root. - If it exists, read it and look for entries under the
hooks.before_taskskey - If the YAML cannot be parsed or is invalid, skip hook checking silently and continue normally
- Filter out hooks where
enabledis explicitlyfalse. Treat hooks without anenabledfield as enabled by default. - For each remaining hook, do not attempt to interpret or evaluate hook
conditionexpressions:- If the hook has no
conditionfield, or it is null/empty, treat the hook as executable - If the hook defines a non-empty
condition, skip the hook and leave condition evaluation to the HookExecutor implementation
- If the hook has no
- For each executable hook, output the following based on its
optionalflag:- Optional hook (
optional: true):## Extension Hooks **Optional Pre-Hook**: {extension} Command: `/{command}` Description: {description} Prompt: {prompt} To execute: `/{command}` - Mandatory hook (
optional: false):After emitting the block above you MUST actually invoke the hook and wait for it to finish before continuing. Run it the same way you would run the command yourself in this agent/session (the invocation may differ from the literal## Extension Hooks **Automatic Pre-Hook**: {extension} Executing: `/{command}` EXECUTE_COMMAND: {command} Wait for the result of the hook command before proceeding to the Outline.{command}id shown above, e.g. a skills-mode agent runs it as/skill:speckit-...or$speckit-...). Emitting the block alone does not run the hook.
- Optional hook (
- If no hooks are registered or
.specify/extensions.ymldoes not exist, skip silently
Outline
-
Setup: Run
{SCRIPT}from repo root and parse FEATURE_DIR, TASKS_TEMPLATE, and AVAILABLE_DOCS list.FEATURE_DIRandTASKS_TEMPLATEmust be absolute paths when provided.AVAILABLE_DOCSis a list of document names/relative paths available underFEATURE_DIR(for exampleresearch.mdorcontracts/). For single quotes in args like "I'm Groot", use escape syntax: e.g 'I'''m Groot' (or double-quote if possible: "I'm Groot"). -
Load design documents: Read from FEATURE_DIR:
- Required: plan.md (tech stack, libraries, structure), spec.md (user stories with priorities)
- Optional: data-model.md (entities), contracts/ (interface contracts), research.md (decisions), quickstart.md (test scenarios)
- IF EXISTS: Load
/memory/constitution.mdfor project principles and governance constraints - Note: Not all projects have all documents. Generate tasks based on what's available.
-
Execute task generation workflow:
- Load plan.md and extract tech stack, libraries, project structure
- Load spec.md and extract user stories with their priorities (P1, P2, P3, etc.)
- If data-model.md exists: Extract entities and map to user stories
- If contracts/ exists: Map interface contracts to user stories
- If research.md exists: Extract decisions for setup tasks
- Generate tasks organized by user story (see Task Generation Rules below)
- Generate dependency graph showing user story completion order
- Create parallel execution examples per user story
- Validate task completeness (each user story has all needed tasks, independently testable)
-
Generate tasks.md: Read the tasks template from TASKS_TEMPLATE (from the JSON output above) and use it as structure. If TASKS_TEMPLATE is empty, fall back to
.specify/templates/tasks-template.md. Fill with:- Correct feature name from plan.md
- Phase 1: Setup tasks (project initialization)
- Phase 2: Foundational tasks (blocking prerequisites for all user stories)
- Phase 3+: One phase per user story (in priority order from spec.md)
- Each phase includes: story goal, independent test criteria, tests (if requested), implementation tasks
- Final Phase: Polish & cross-cutting concerns
- All tasks must follow the strict checklist format (see Task Generation Rules below)
- Clear file paths for each task
- Dependencies section showing story completion order
- Parallel execution examples per story
- Implementation strategy section (MVP first, incremental delivery)
Mandatory Post-Execution Hooks
You MUST complete this section before reporting completion to the user.
Check if .specify/extensions.yml exists in the project root.
- If it does not exist, or no hooks are registered under
hooks.after_tasks, skip to the Completion Report. - If it exists, read it and look for entries under the
hooks.after_taskskey. - If the YAML cannot be parsed or is invalid, skip hook checking silently and continue to the Completion Report.
- Filter out hooks where
enabledis explicitlyfalse. Treat hooks without anenabledfield as enabled by default. - For each remaining hook, do not attempt to interpret or evaluate hook
conditionexpressions:- If the hook has no
conditionfield, or it is null/empty, treat the hook as executable - If the hook defines a non-empty
condition, skip the hook and leave condition evaluation to the HookExecutor implementation
- If the hook has no
- For each executable hook, output the following based on its
optionalflag:- Mandatory hook (
optional: false) — You MUST emitEXECUTE_COMMAND:for each mandatory hook:After emitting the block above you MUST actually invoke the hook and wait for it to finish before continuing. Run it the same way you would run the command yourself in this agent/session (the invocation may differ from the literal## Extension Hooks **Automatic Hook**: {extension} Executing: `/{command}` EXECUTE_COMMAND: {command}{command}id shown above, e.g. a skills-mode agent runs it as/skill:speckit-...or$speckit-...). Emitting the block alone does not run the hook. - Optional hook (
optional: true):## Extension Hooks **Optional Hook**: {extension} Command: `/{command}` Description: {description} Prompt: {prompt} To execute: `/{command}`
- Mandatory hook (
Completion Report
Output path to generated tasks.md and summary:
- Total task count
- Task count per user story
- Parallel opportunities identified
- Independent test criteria for each story
- Suggested MVP scope (typically just User Story 1)
- Format validation: Confirm ALL tasks follow the checklist format (checkbox, ID, labels, file paths)
Context for task generation: {ARGS}
The tasks.md should be immediately executable - each task must be specific enough that an LLM can complete it without additional context.
Task Generation Rules
CRITICAL: Tasks MUST be organized by user story to enable independent implementation and testing.
Tests are OPTIONAL: Only generate test tasks if explicitly requested in the feature specification or if user requests TDD approach.
Checklist Format (REQUIRED)
Every task MUST strictly follow this format:
- [ ] [TaskID] [P?] [Story?] Description with file path
Format Components:
- Checkbox: ALWAYS start with
- [ ](markdown checkbox) - Task ID: Sequential number (T001, T002, T003...) in execution order
- [P] marker: Include ONLY if task is parallelizable (different files, no dependencies on incomplete tasks)
- [Story] label: REQUIRED for user story phase tasks only
- Format: [US1], [US2], [US3], etc. (maps to user stories from spec.md)
- Setup phase: NO story label
- Foundational phase: NO story label
- User Story phases: MUST have story label
- Polish phase: NO story label
- Description: Clear action with exact file path
Examples:
- ✅ CORRECT:
- [ ] T001 Create project structure per implementation plan - ✅ CORRECT:
- [ ] T005 [P] Implement authentication middleware in src/middleware/auth.py - ✅ CORRECT:
- [ ] T012 [P] [US1] Create User model in src/models/user.py - ✅ CORRECT:
- [ ] T014 [US1] Implement UserService in src/services/user_service.py - ❌ WRONG:
- [ ] Create User model(missing ID and Story label) - ❌ WRONG:
T001 [US1] Create model(missing checkbox) - ❌ WRONG:
- [ ] [US1] Create User model(missing Task ID) - ❌ WRONG:
- [ ] T001 [US1] Create model(missing file path)
Task Organization
-
From User Stories (spec.md) - PRIMARY ORGANIZATION:
- Each user story (P1, P2, P3...) gets its own phase
- Map all related components to their story:
- Models needed for that story
- Services needed for that story
- Interfaces/UI needed for that story
- If tests requested: Tests specific to that story
- Mark story dependencies (most stories should be independent)
-
From Contracts:
- Map each interface contract → to the user story it serves
- If tests requested: Each interface contract → contract test task [P] before implementation in that story's phase
-
From Data Model:
- Map each entity to the user story(ies) that need it
- If entity serves multiple stories: Put in earliest story or Setup phase
- Relationships → service layer tasks in appropriate story phase
-
From Setup/Infrastructure:
- Shared infrastructure → Setup phase (Phase 1)
- Foundational/blocking tasks → Foundational phase (Phase 2)
- Story-specific setup → within that story's phase
Phase Structure
- Phase 1: Setup (project initialization)
- Phase 2: Foundational (blocking prerequisites - MUST complete before user stories)
- Phase 3+: User Stories in priority order (P1, P2, P3...)
- Within each story: Tests (if requested) → Models → Services → Endpoints → Integration
- Each phase should be a complete, independently testable increment
- Final Phase: Polish & Cross-Cutting Concerns
Done When
- tasks.md generated with all phases, task IDs, and file paths
- Extension hooks dispatched or skipped according to the rules in Mandatory Post-Execution Hooks above
- Completion reported to user with task count, story breakdown, and MVP scope