* fix(workflows): validate requires keys and reject phantom permissions gate A workflow's `requires` block was parsed but its keys were never validated, so a typo or an unsupported key was silently ignored. Most importantly, authors could write `requires.permissions.shell: true` expecting a runtime capability gate — but no such gate exists: a `shell` step always runs with the user's privileges. The declaration gave a false sense of sandboxing. `validate_workflow` now accepts only the recognised keys (`speckit_version`, `integrations`, `tools`, `mcp`) and rejects anything else, with an explicit error for `requires.permissions` pointing authors to `gate` steps for approval. Docs and the model comment are updated to state that `requires` is advisory, not a security boundary. - Reject non-mapping `requires`, unknown keys, and `requires.permissions` - Clarify workflows reference + PUBLISHING.md shell-step guidance - Tests for valid keys, non-mapping, unknown key, and permissions Signed-off-by: Zied Jlassi <6190550+zied-jlassi@users.noreply.github.com> Assisted-by: AI * fix(workflows): address review feedback on requires validation Follow-up to the review on #3079: - Guard `requires` validation on `is not None` instead of truthiness so a falsy non-mapping value (e.g. `requires: []` or `requires: ''`) is reported as an error instead of being silently skipped; `requires:` (YAML null) is still treated as an omitted block. Add a regression test. - Reword the workflows security note so `requires.permissions` is shown as rejected/unsupported rather than as a valid example of `requires`. - Standardize on US spelling (`_RECOGNIZED_REQUIRES_KEYS`, "recognized") to match the surrounding code and ease searching. - Tighten the permissions-rejection test to assert on specific message markers (`requires.permissions` and the `gate` guidance) so it fails if the validation path or wording drifts. Assisted-by: AI Signed-off-by: Zied Jlassi (Architect AI) <6190550+zied-jlassi@users.noreply.github.com> * fix(workflows): scope requires validation to workflow keys (drop tools/mcp) tools and mcp belong to the bundle manifest requires schema (bundler/models/manifest.py, resolved in bundler/services/resolver.py), not the workflow requires validated here. Drop them from _RECOGNIZED_REQUIRES_KEYS and revert the PUBLISHING.md claim that this PR had introduced, so workflow requires only recognizes speckit_version and integrations. This keeps the existing docs accurate and resolves the inline doc-consistency review comments. Signed-off-by: Zied Jlassi <6190550+zied-jlassi@users.noreply.github.com> * refactor(workflows): type WorkflowDefinition.requires as Any pre-validation self.requires holds the raw parsed value, which before validate_workflow() runs may be a non-mapping (None for a bare 'requires:', a list for 'requires: []', etc.). Annotating it dict[str, Any] was misleading for editors/type-checkers; use Any and document that validate_workflow() enforces the mapping shape. Addresses Copilot review feedback on engine.py. Signed-off-by: Zied Jlassi <6190550+zied-jlassi@users.noreply.github.com> * fix(workflows): reject YAML-null requires: as a non-mapping Address Copilot review: validate requires the same way as inputs. A bare requires: parses as YAML null and was previously treated as an omitted block, which is inconsistent with inputs and lets a stray requires: line be silently ignored. Drop the is-not-None guard and check isinstance(..., dict) directly: an omitted block still defaults to {} (valid), but a present-but-non-mapping value -- YAML null, [] or '' -- is now an authoring error that surfaces. Tests: add YAML-null rejection + an omitted-is-still-valid guard test. Signed-off-by: Zied Jlassi <6190550+zied-jlassi@users.noreply.github.com> --------- Signed-off-by: Zied Jlassi <6190550+zied-jlassi@users.noreply.github.com> Signed-off-by: Zied Jlassi (Architect AI) <6190550+zied-jlassi@users.noreply.github.com>
Workflows
Workflows are multi-step, resumable automation pipelines defined in YAML. They orchestrate Spec Kit commands across integrations, evaluate control flow, and pause at human review gates — enabling end-to-end Spec-Driven Development cycles without manual step-by-step invocation.
How It Works
A workflow definition declares a sequence of steps. The engine executes them in order, dispatching commands to AI integrations, running shell commands, evaluating conditions for branching, and pausing at gates for human review. State is persisted after each step, so workflows can be resumed after interruption.
steps:
- id: specify
command: speckit.specify
input:
args: "{{ inputs.spec }}"
- id: review
type: gate
message: "Review the spec before planning."
options: [approve, reject]
on_reject: abort
- id: plan
command: speckit.plan
For detailed architecture and internals, see ARCHITECTURE.md.
Quick Start
# Search available workflows
specify workflow search
# Install the built-in SDD workflow
specify workflow add speckit
# Or run directly from a local YAML file
specify workflow run ./workflow.yml --input spec="Build a user authentication system with OAuth support"
# Run an installed workflow with inputs
specify workflow run speckit --input spec="Build a user authentication system with OAuth support"
# Check run status
specify workflow status
# Resume after a gate pause
specify workflow resume <run_id>
# Get detailed workflow info
specify workflow info speckit
# Remove a workflow
specify workflow remove speckit
Running Workflows
From an Installed Workflow
specify workflow add speckit
specify workflow run speckit --input spec="Build a user authentication system with OAuth support"
From a Local YAML File
specify workflow run ./my-workflow.yml --input spec="Build a user authentication system with OAuth support"
Multiple Inputs
specify workflow run speckit \
--input spec="Build a user authentication system with OAuth support" \
--input scope="backend-only"
Step Types
Workflows support 11 built-in step types:
Command Steps (default)
Invoke an installed Spec Kit command by name via the integration CLI:
- id: specify
command: speckit.specify
input:
args: "{{ inputs.spec }}"
integration: claude # Optional: override workflow default
model: "claude-sonnet-4-20250514" # Optional: override model
Prompt Steps
Send an arbitrary inline prompt to an integration CLI (no command file needed):
- id: security-review
type: prompt
prompt: "Review {{ inputs.file }} for security vulnerabilities"
integration: claude
Shell Steps
Run a shell command and capture output:
- id: run-tests
type: shell
run: "cd {{ inputs.project_dir }} && npm test"
Init Steps
Bootstrap a project the same way specify init does — scaffolding
templates, scripts, shared infrastructure, and the selected coding agent
integration. Runs non-interactively (defaults to --ignore-agent-tools)
and resolves the integration from the step config or the workflow default:
- id: bootstrap
type: init
here: true # or: project: my-project
integration: copilot # Optional: defaults to workflow integration
integration_options: "--skills" # Optional: extra options for the integration
script: sh # Optional: sh or ps
force: true # Optional: required when target directory already exists
preset: healthcare-compliance # Optional preset ID
Gate Steps
Pause for human review. The workflow resumes when specify workflow resume is called:
- id: review-spec
type: gate
message: "Review the generated spec before planning."
options: [approve, edit, reject]
on_reject: abort
If/Then/Else Steps
Conditional branching based on an expression:
- id: check-scope
type: if
condition: "{{ inputs.scope == 'full' }}"
then:
- id: full-plan
command: speckit.plan
else:
- id: quick-plan
command: speckit.plan
options:
quick: true
Switch Steps
Multi-branch dispatch on an expression value:
- id: route
type: switch
expression: "{{ steps.review.output.choice }}"
cases:
approve:
- id: plan
command: speckit.plan
reject:
- id: log
type: shell
run: "echo 'Rejected'"
default:
- id: fallback
type: gate
message: "Unexpected choice"
While Loop Steps
Repeat steps while a condition is truthy:
- id: retry
type: while
condition: "{{ steps.run-tests.output.exit_code != 0 }}"
max_iterations: 5
steps:
- id: fix
command: speckit.implement
Do-While Loop Steps
Execute steps at least once, then repeat while condition holds:
- id: refine
type: do-while
condition: "{{ steps.review.output.choice == 'edit' }}"
max_iterations: 3
steps:
- id: revise
command: speckit.specify
Fan-Out Steps
Dispatch a step template for each item in a collection (sequential):
- id: parallel-impl
type: fan-out
items: "{{ steps.tasks.output.task_list }}"
max_concurrency: 3
step:
id: impl
command: speckit.implement
Fan-In Steps
Aggregate results from fan-out steps:
- id: collect
type: fan-in
wait_for: [parallel-impl]
output: {}
Error Handling
By default, any step that returns StepResult(status=StepStatus.FAILED, ...)
at runtime halts the entire run — most commonly a shell or
command step exiting non-zero. Set continue_on_error: true on
a step to record its result and continue to the next sibling step
instead. When the failure was a non-zero exit, the exit code
remains available on steps.<id>.output.exit_code so a downstream
if or switch can branch on it (or a gate can surface it to
the operator via {{ }} interpolation in message):
- id: heavy-thing
type: command
integration: claude
command: speckit.heavy-thing
continue_on_error: true
- id: check-result
type: if
condition: "{{ steps.heavy-thing.output.exit_code != 0 }}"
then:
- id: review
type: gate
message: "Step failed (exit {{ steps.heavy-thing.output.exit_code }}). Approve to run the recovery path, or reject to leave the failure recorded and move on."
on_reject: skip
- id: recover
type: if
condition: "{{ steps.review.output.choice == 'approve' }}"
then:
- id: rerun
command: speckit.recovery
else:
- id: next-thing
command: speckit.next-thing
A few things worth knowing about that example:
- Both gate options (
approve,reject) returnStepStatus.COMPLETED;on_reject: skipcontrols only whether the engine aborts on reject (it doesn't, withskip) — it does not auto-skip subsequent sibling steps in thethen:list. Downstream branching is the workflow author's responsibility: read{{ steps.<gate-id>.output.choice }}in a follow-upif,switch, or expression, as therecoverstep above does. on_rejecthas three values:abort(default — reject →StepStatus.FAILEDwithoutput.aborted = True, halts the run),skip(reject →StepStatus.COMPLETED, author handles branching as shown), andretry(reject →StepStatus.PAUSEDso the nextspecify workflow resumere-runs the gate).- Gates do not automatically re-run the failed step. To express a retry path, either define custom gate options and branch on the choice downstream, or wrap the failing step in your own loop.
Notes:
- The field must be a literal boolean (
true/false); coerced strings like"true"are rejected at validation time. - Scope: returned failures only. The flag applies to step results
with
status=StepStatus.FAILED. Unhandled exceptions raised out of a step'sexecute()method are caught one level up byWorkflowEngine.execute(), logged asworkflow_failed, and abort the run regardless ofcontinue_on_error. If a step author wants the flag to cover an exceptional path, the step must catch the exception internally and returnStepResult(status=StepStatus.FAILED, ...)with the failure encoded inoutput(e.g.exit_code,stderr, or a custom field). - Gate aborts (
on_reject: abortchosen by the operator) always halt the run —continue_on_errordoes not override them. The flag is for transient/expected step failures, not for overriding deliberate operator decisions. - Structural validation runs up-front:
specify workflow runrejects invalid workflow definitions before the run is created, so validation failures never reach this code path. - When the flag is omitted, behaviour is byte-equivalent to before this feature.
Expressions
Workflow definitions use {{ expression }} syntax for dynamic values:
# Access inputs
args: "{{ inputs.spec }}"
# Access previous step outputs
args: "{{ steps.specify.output.file }}"
# Comparisons
condition: "{{ steps.run-tests.output.exit_code != 0 }}"
# Filters
message: "{{ status | default('pending') }}"
Supported filters: default, join, contains, map, from_json.
Runtime Context
{{ context.* }} exposes engine-managed runtime metadata for the
current run:
| Variable | Description |
|---|---|
context.run_id |
The current workflow run id (the same value Spec Kit prints as Run ID: at the end of workflow run). Auto-generated runs are 8-character hex from uuid4; operator-supplied ids may be any alphanumeric string with hyphens or underscores. Empty string outside a run context. |
# Stamp telemetry events with the run id for cross-system join.
- id: emit-event
type: shell
run: 'echo "{\"run_id\":\"{{ context.run_id }}\",\"event\":\"started\"}" >> events.jsonl'
# Per-run scratch directory.
- id: prep-scratch
type: shell
run: 'mkdir -p /tmp/run-{{ context.run_id }}'
# Pass run id into a command for artifact metadata.
- id: tag-artifact
command: speckit.specify
input:
args: "{{ context.run_id }}"
Input Types
Workflow inputs are type-checked and coerced from CLI string values:
inputs:
spec:
type: string
required: true
prompt: "Describe what you want to build"
task_count:
type: number
default: 5
dry_run:
type: boolean
default: false
scope:
type: string
default: "full"
enum: ["full", "backend-only", "frontend-only"]
| Type | Accepts | Example |
|---|---|---|
string |
Any string | "user-auth" |
number |
Numeric strings → int/float | "42" → 42 |
boolean |
true/1/yes → True, false/0/no → False |
"true" → True |
State and Resume
Every workflow run persists state to .specify/workflows/runs/<run_id>/:
# List all runs with status
specify workflow status
# Check a specific run
specify workflow status <run_id>
# Resume a paused run (after approving a gate)
specify workflow resume <run_id>
# Resume a failed run (retries from the failed step)
specify workflow resume <run_id>
Run states: created → running → completed | paused | failed | aborted
Catalog Management
Workflows are discovered through catalogs. By default, Spec Kit uses the official and community catalogs:
Note
Community workflows are independently created and maintained by their respective authors. GitHub and the Spec Kit maintainers may review pull requests that add entries to the community catalog for formatting and structure, but they do not review, audit, endorse, or support the workflow definitions themselves. Review workflow source before installation and use at your own discretion.
# List active catalogs
specify workflow catalog list
# Add a custom catalog
specify workflow catalog add https://example.com/catalog.json --name my-org
# Remove a catalog
specify workflow catalog remove <index>
Creating a Workflow
- Create a
workflow.ymlfollowing the schema above - Test locally with
specify workflow run ./workflow.yml --input key=value - Verify with
specify workflow info ./workflow.yml - See PUBLISHING.md to submit to the catalog
Environment Variables
| Variable | Description |
|---|---|
SPECKIT_WORKFLOW_CATALOG_URL |
Override the catalog URL (replaces all defaults) |
Configuration Files
| File | Scope | Description |
|---|---|---|
.specify/workflow-catalogs.yml |
Project | Custom catalog stack for this project |
~/.specify/workflow-catalogs.yml |
User | Custom catalog stack for all projects |
Repository Layout
workflows/
├── ARCHITECTURE.md # Internal architecture documentation
├── PUBLISHING.md # Guide for submitting workflows to the catalog
├── README.md # This file
├── catalog.json # Official workflow catalog
├── catalog.community.json # Community workflow catalog
└── speckit/ # Built-in SDD cycle workflow
└── workflow.yml