* fix: promote post-execution hook dispatch to H2 with directive language
Restructure the after_* hook dispatch in all five core command templates
(specify, clarify, implement, plan, tasks) to make hook execution
structurally unmissable by LLMs during interactive slash-command flows.
Changes applied consistently across all five templates:
1. Promote hook block from a final numbered step to a top-level
'## Mandatory Post-Execution Hooks' H2, placed before the completion
report. An H2 boundary is salient in a way that a numbered sub-step
buried after 'Report completion' is not.
2. Use directive language for mandatory hooks: 'You MUST emit
EXECUTE_COMMAND: for each mandatory hook' and 'You MUST complete this
section before reporting completion to the user.' The previous
conditional framing ('check if', 'based on its optional flag') buried
the mandatory cases.
3. List mandatory hooks before optional hooks in the dispatch block, so
the required action appears first.
4. Add a terminal '## Done When' verification checklist at the end of
each template, including 'Extension hooks dispatched' as an explicit
completion criterion. This gives the model a structured opportunity to
verify completion before exiting.
5. Extract the completion report into its own '## Completion Report' H2
section, clearly separated from the hook dispatch.
These changes preserve the interactive-vs-workflow distinction and do not
introduce auto-run. They raise the reliability of the existing
best-effort dispatch mechanism.
Fixes #2688
* fix: address review — narrow Done When wording and move to end of templates
- Narrow the hooks checklist item from a broad condition to 'dispatched
or skipped according to the rules in Mandatory Post-Execution Hooks
above' so it does not contradict the filtering rules for disabled
hooks or hooks with non-empty conditions.
- Move the Done When section to the actual end of specify.md, plan.md,
and tasks.md so it does not signal premature completion before the
agent reads required guidance sections (Quick Guidelines, Phases/Key
rules, Task Generation Rules).
* fix: update stale step 8 reference in specify.md validation flow
The old 'proceed to step 8' pointed to the completion report step that
was renumbered when hook dispatch was promoted to its own H2 section.
Update the reference to point to 'Mandatory Post-Execution Hooks'.
9.7 KiB
description, handoffs, scripts
| description | handoffs | scripts | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Generate an actionable, dependency-ordered tasks.md for the feature based on available design artifacts. |
|
|
User Input
$ARGUMENTS
You MUST consider the user input before proceeding (if not empty).
Pre-Execution Checks
Check for extension hooks (before tasks generation):
- Check if
.specify/extensions.ymlexists in the project root. - If it exists, read it and look for entries under the
hooks.before_taskskey - If the YAML cannot be parsed or is invalid, skip hook checking silently and continue normally
- Filter out hooks where
enabledis explicitlyfalse. Treat hooks without anenabledfield as enabled by default. - For each remaining hook, do not attempt to interpret or evaluate hook
conditionexpressions:- If the hook has no
conditionfield, or it is null/empty, treat the hook as executable - If the hook defines a non-empty
condition, skip the hook and leave condition evaluation to the HookExecutor implementation
- If the hook has no
- For each executable hook, output the following based on its
optionalflag:- Optional hook (
optional: true):## Extension Hooks **Optional Pre-Hook**: {extension} Command: `/{command}` Description: {description} Prompt: {prompt} To execute: `/{command}` - Mandatory hook (
optional: false):## Extension Hooks **Automatic Pre-Hook**: {extension} Executing: `/{command}` EXECUTE_COMMAND: {command} Wait for the result of the hook command before proceeding to the Outline.
- Optional hook (
- If no hooks are registered or
.specify/extensions.ymldoes not exist, skip silently
Outline
-
Setup: Run
{SCRIPT}from repo root and parse FEATURE_DIR, TASKS_TEMPLATE, and AVAILABLE_DOCS list.FEATURE_DIRandTASKS_TEMPLATEmust be absolute paths when provided.AVAILABLE_DOCSis a list of document names/relative paths available underFEATURE_DIR(for exampleresearch.mdorcontracts/). For single quotes in args like "I'm Groot", use escape syntax: e.g 'I'''m Groot' (or double-quote if possible: "I'm Groot"). -
Load design documents: Read from FEATURE_DIR:
- Required: plan.md (tech stack, libraries, structure), spec.md (user stories with priorities)
- Optional: data-model.md (entities), contracts/ (interface contracts), research.md (decisions), quickstart.md (test scenarios)
- Note: Not all projects have all documents. Generate tasks based on what's available.
-
Execute task generation workflow:
- Load plan.md and extract tech stack, libraries, project structure
- Load spec.md and extract user stories with their priorities (P1, P2, P3, etc.)
- If data-model.md exists: Extract entities and map to user stories
- If contracts/ exists: Map interface contracts to user stories
- If research.md exists: Extract decisions for setup tasks
- Generate tasks organized by user story (see Task Generation Rules below)
- Generate dependency graph showing user story completion order
- Create parallel execution examples per user story
- Validate task completeness (each user story has all needed tasks, independently testable)
-
Generate tasks.md: Read the tasks template from TASKS_TEMPLATE (from the JSON output above) and use it as structure. If TASKS_TEMPLATE is empty, fall back to
.specify/templates/tasks-template.md. Fill with:- Correct feature name from plan.md
- Phase 1: Setup tasks (project initialization)
- Phase 2: Foundational tasks (blocking prerequisites for all user stories)
- Phase 3+: One phase per user story (in priority order from spec.md)
- Each phase includes: story goal, independent test criteria, tests (if requested), implementation tasks
- Final Phase: Polish & cross-cutting concerns
- All tasks must follow the strict checklist format (see Task Generation Rules below)
- Clear file paths for each task
- Dependencies section showing story completion order
- Parallel execution examples per story
- Implementation strategy section (MVP first, incremental delivery)
Mandatory Post-Execution Hooks
You MUST complete this section before reporting completion to the user.
Check if .specify/extensions.yml exists in the project root.
- If it does not exist, or no hooks are registered under
hooks.after_tasks, skip to the Completion Report. - If it exists, read it and look for entries under the
hooks.after_taskskey. - If the YAML cannot be parsed or is invalid, skip hook checking silently and continue to the Completion Report.
- Filter out hooks where
enabledis explicitlyfalse. Treat hooks without anenabledfield as enabled by default. - For each remaining hook, do not attempt to interpret or evaluate hook
conditionexpressions:- If the hook has no
conditionfield, or it is null/empty, treat the hook as executable - If the hook defines a non-empty
condition, skip the hook and leave condition evaluation to the HookExecutor implementation
- If the hook has no
- For each executable hook, output the following based on its
optionalflag:- Mandatory hook (
optional: false) — You MUST emitEXECUTE_COMMAND:for each mandatory hook:## Extension Hooks **Automatic Hook**: {extension} Executing: `/{command}` EXECUTE_COMMAND: {command} - Optional hook (
optional: true):## Extension Hooks **Optional Hook**: {extension} Command: `/{command}` Description: {description} Prompt: {prompt} To execute: `/{command}`
- Mandatory hook (
Completion Report
Output path to generated tasks.md and summary:
- Total task count
- Task count per user story
- Parallel opportunities identified
- Independent test criteria for each story
- Suggested MVP scope (typically just User Story 1)
- Format validation: Confirm ALL tasks follow the checklist format (checkbox, ID, labels, file paths)
Context for task generation: {ARGS}
The tasks.md should be immediately executable - each task must be specific enough that an LLM can complete it without additional context.
Task Generation Rules
CRITICAL: Tasks MUST be organized by user story to enable independent implementation and testing.
Tests are OPTIONAL: Only generate test tasks if explicitly requested in the feature specification or if user requests TDD approach.
Checklist Format (REQUIRED)
Every task MUST strictly follow this format:
- [ ] [TaskID] [P?] [Story?] Description with file path
Format Components:
- Checkbox: ALWAYS start with
- [ ](markdown checkbox) - Task ID: Sequential number (T001, T002, T003...) in execution order
- [P] marker: Include ONLY if task is parallelizable (different files, no dependencies on incomplete tasks)
- [Story] label: REQUIRED for user story phase tasks only
- Format: [US1], [US2], [US3], etc. (maps to user stories from spec.md)
- Setup phase: NO story label
- Foundational phase: NO story label
- User Story phases: MUST have story label
- Polish phase: NO story label
- Description: Clear action with exact file path
Examples:
- ✅ CORRECT:
- [ ] T001 Create project structure per implementation plan - ✅ CORRECT:
- [ ] T005 [P] Implement authentication middleware in src/middleware/auth.py - ✅ CORRECT:
- [ ] T012 [P] [US1] Create User model in src/models/user.py - ✅ CORRECT:
- [ ] T014 [US1] Implement UserService in src/services/user_service.py - ❌ WRONG:
- [ ] Create User model(missing ID and Story label) - ❌ WRONG:
T001 [US1] Create model(missing checkbox) - ❌ WRONG:
- [ ] [US1] Create User model(missing Task ID) - ❌ WRONG:
- [ ] T001 [US1] Create model(missing file path)
Task Organization
-
From User Stories (spec.md) - PRIMARY ORGANIZATION:
- Each user story (P1, P2, P3...) gets its own phase
- Map all related components to their story:
- Models needed for that story
- Services needed for that story
- Interfaces/UI needed for that story
- If tests requested: Tests specific to that story
- Mark story dependencies (most stories should be independent)
-
From Contracts:
- Map each interface contract → to the user story it serves
- If tests requested: Each interface contract → contract test task [P] before implementation in that story's phase
-
From Data Model:
- Map each entity to the user story(ies) that need it
- If entity serves multiple stories: Put in earliest story or Setup phase
- Relationships → service layer tasks in appropriate story phase
-
From Setup/Infrastructure:
- Shared infrastructure → Setup phase (Phase 1)
- Foundational/blocking tasks → Foundational phase (Phase 2)
- Story-specific setup → within that story's phase
Phase Structure
- Phase 1: Setup (project initialization)
- Phase 2: Foundational (blocking prerequisites - MUST complete before user stories)
- Phase 3+: User Stories in priority order (P1, P2, P3...)
- Within each story: Tests (if requested) → Models → Services → Endpoints → Integration
- Each phase should be a complete, independently testable increment
- Final Phase: Polish & Cross-Cutting Concerns
Done When
- tasks.md generated with all phases, task IDs, and file paths
- Extension hooks dispatched or skipped according to the rules in Mandatory Post-Execution Hooks above
- Completion reported to user with task count, story breakdown, and MVP scope