Add support for invoking diff editors (`jj diffedit`, `jj split`, etc.) once per changed file, instead of once with a temporary directory pair. This enables using per-file tools like `vimdiff` for editing.
The new `merge-tools.<tool>.edit-invocation-mode` option controls this independently from `diff-invocation-mode`.
Fixes#7760.
Mostly done with OpenCode and Claude Sonnet 4.6 with the following prompt,
and reviewed manually:
Replace the Result.unwrap with the ? operator in test functions.
While doing that, make sure to:
* Add TestResult as return type in the test functions where you replace
unwrap by the ? operator, and Ok(()) at the end.
* Do the replacement only in method with the `#[test]` decorator.
* Don't replace unwraps in closures.
* Don't replace Option.unwrap.
* Be careful to not change the insta snapshot references.
* Run the tests each time you're done with a file.
* Keep the unwraps that you can't replace with the ? operator.
Note that:
* You can identify all the Result.unwrap locations with this command:
cargo clippy --tests --message-format=short -- -W clippy::unwrap_used 2>&1 | grep / | grep Result | grep <filename>
* Begin with the file with the most Result.unwrap in them as shown by
this command:
cargo clippy --tests --message-format=short -- -W clippy::unwrap_used 2>&1 | grep Result | cut -d: -f1 | sort | uniq -c | sort -nr
* Some non test files have inline tests.
Before this PR:
❯ cargo clippy --tests --message-format=short -- -W clippy::unwrap_used 2>&1 | grep Result | wc -l
3973
After this PR:
❯ cargo clippy --tests --message-format=short -- -W clippy::unwrap_used 2>&1 | grep Result | wc -l
1064
Currently, checking out a commit with conflicts in a colocated workspace
causes many editors to show all existing files as added since they
aren't present in the Git HEAD commit. Using the tree of the first side
of the commit as a base tree and then adding the '.jjconflict-*' trees
on top of it would cause any files identical to the first tree to show
as unchanged, matching Git's conflict behavior.
One potential downside to this change is that it becomes harder for a
user to notice if they incorrectly check out a conflicted commit using
`git switch`, since previously all of their files would've disappeared
so it would be more difficult to ignore. However, I think this could be
solved a different way, such as by adding a warning when snapshotting if
'.jjconflict' files are detected. Keeping the files from the first
tree also has the benefit that '.gitignore' files will still be present,
meaning that when a user does `jj abandon` to recover, it won't delete
their ignored files.
Using 'JJ-CONFLICT-README' as the name for the readme file instead of
'README' makes it more clear that this file is related to the
'.jjconflict-*' trees, since now the repo's actual README file might be
present as well in the tree.
An example with parents `rtsqusxu` and `ysrnknol`:
```
<<<<<<< conflict 1 of 1
%%%%%%% diff from: vpxusssl 38d49363 "description of base"
\\\\\\\ to: rtsqusxu 2768b0b9 "description of left"
-base
+left
+++++++ ysrnknol 7a20f389 "description of right"
right
>>>>>>> conflict 1 of 1 ends
```
Conflict labels will generally start with lowercase change IDs, so
making all of the text lowercase makes it more consistent. I also
removed the "contents of" text, since conflict labels will already be
long enough, and this text doesn't add anything. Similarly, I removed
the "(conflict 1 of 1)" note from the Git conflict markers since Git
doesn't include this information, and including it would result in extra
long lines once we add conflict labels.
Running "cargo insta test --workspace", results in numerous warnings:
Snapshot test passes but the existing value is in a legacy format.
Please run `cargo insta test --force-update-snapshots` to update to
a newer format.
This commit is the result of running the suggested command.
As a follow-up to #8115, this moves all references in the codebase to use the new website.
I didn't update the older CHANGELOG entries because I figured they're intended
to be immutable.
Deprecation warnings will be emitted for default "substring:" patterns. This
change will suppress them. Since "glob:" will be the new default, I made these
tests use "glob:" when both "exact:" and "glob:" work.
Tests for the revset filter functions aren't updated.
I got annoyed by the checkout function and tried to compress the code a bit,
and I think the result is much nicer. I'm not certain that a closure is the
right solution here, but I think it becomes easier to reason about the two
temp filenames that get generated.
I initially changed `Option<DiffSide>` to a bool, but found an enum more
meaningful and more likely to be flexible in the future.
I also moved the instruction writing to its own function. This makes the main
`DiffEditWorkingCopies::check_out()` function much nicer.
We haven't had any reports of problems from people who opted in. Since
it's early in the release cycle now, let's now test it on everyone who
builds from head, so we get almost a month of testing from those
people before it's enabled by default in a released version.
This impacts lots of test cases because the change-id header is added
to the Git commit. Most are uninteresting. `test_git_fetch` now sees
some divergent changes where it used to see only divergent bookmarks,
which makes sense.
I usually don't read these messages carefully, and the red "(conflict)" label
looked scary. Suppose we don't have to take further action on resolved commits,
I don't think we need to print commit summary for each resolved commit.
I'm going to add "[EOF]" marker to test that command output is terminated by
newline char. This patch ensures that callers who expect a raw output string
would never be affected by any normalization passes.
Some common normalization functions are extracted as CommandOutputString
methods.
With this change a warning is shown if the user does not explicitly specify the target revision, but the behavior is unchanged (it still defaults to the working copy).
In the future the warning will be turned into an error. In other words, it will be required to specify target revision.
The bulk of the changes here are to prepare tests for the upcoming change, to make the transition easier.
For additional details please see:
* https://github.com/jj-vcs/jj/issues/5374
* https://github.com/jj-vcs/jj/discussions/5363
Both Mercurial and Git (xdiff) have a special case for empty hunks.
https://repo.mercurial-scm.org/hg/rev/2b1ec74c961f
I also changed the internal line numbers to start from 0 so we wouldn't have
to think about whether "N - 1" would underflow.
Fixes#5049
I left the "merge-tool-edits-conflict-markers" option unchanged,
since removing it would likely break some existing configurations. It
also seems like it could be useful to have a merge tool use the default
conflict markers instead of requiring the conflict marker style to
always be set for the merge tool (e.g. if a merge tool allows the user
to manually edit the conflicts).
Jujutsu's branches do not behave like Git branches, which is a major
hurdle for people adopting it from Git. They rather behave like
Mercurial's (hg) bookmarks.
We've had multiple discussions about it in the last ~1.5 years about this rename in the Discord,
where multiple people agreed that this _false_ familiarity does not help anyone. Initially we were
reluctant to do it but overtime, more and more users agreed that `bookmark` was a better for name
the current mechanism. This may be hard break for current `jj branch` users, but it will immensly
help Jujutsu's future, by defining it as our first own term. The `[experimental-moving-branches]`
config option is currently left alone, to force not another large config update for
users, since the last time this happened was when `jj log -T show` was removed, which immediately
resulted in breaking users and introduced soft deprecations.
This name change will also make it easier to introduce Topics (#3402) as _topological branches_
with a easier model.
This was mostly done via LSP, ripgrep and sed and a whole bunch of manual changes either from
me being lazy or thankfully pointed out by reviewers.
`tx.format_commit_summary()` can be expensive because it needs to build
an IdPrefixContext now, so it's best to avoid formatting instruction
messages unless they are actually required.
It's common to create empty working-copy commits while using jj, and
currently the author timestamp for a commit is only set when it is first
created. If you create an empty commit, then don't work on a repo for a
few days, and then start working on a new feature without abandoning the
working-copy commit, the author timestamp will remain as the time the
commit was created rather than being updated to the time that work began
or finished.
This commit changes the behavior so that discardable commits (empty
commits with no description) by the current user have their author
timestamps reset when they are rewritten, meaning that the author
timestamp will become finalized whenever a commit is given a description
or becomes non-empty.
We now have two `cmd_show` in the repo. I think this one should become
`cmd_file_show`, but this should be done uniformly over all the commands
for consistency.
I did *not* keep `print` as an alias (I couldn't find a compelling
reason to do it), but let me know if anyone feels like keeping it.
This follows up on https://github.com/martinvonz/jj/pull/3459 and adds a
label to the closing delimeter of each conflict, e.g. "Conflict 1 of 3
ends".
I didn't initially put any label at the ending delimeter since the
starting delimeter is already marked with "Conflict 1 of 3". However,
I'm now realizing that when I resolve conflicts, I usually go from top
to bottom. The first thing I do is delete the starting conflict
delimeter. It is when I get to the *end* of the conflict that I wonder
whether there are any more conflicts left in the file.