As a follow-up to #8115, this moves all references in the codebase to use the new website.
I didn't update the older CHANGELOG entries because I figured they're intended
to be immutable.
Deprecation warnings will be emitted for default "substring:" patterns. This
change will suppress them. Since "glob:" will be the new default, I made these
tests use "glob:" when both "exact:" and "glob:" work.
Tests for the revset filter functions aren't updated.
This paves the way to deprecate `git.auto-local-bookmark` without
adding lots of deprecation warnings to test output snapshots.
The behavior of some tests is slightly changed, because
auto-track-bookmarks also tracks bookmarks that were created locally.
I think it just shows up in output snapshots as absent-tracked
bookmarks, without affecting what the test is about.
As we have discussed many times on Discord and GitHub, `--destination`
is not a great name because `--insert-before` and `--insert-after` are
also destinations. The most popular alternative seems to be
`--onto`. We already use that term in descriptions in several places,
such as in the help text for `rebase -d` where we say "The revision(s)
to rebase onto". This patch therefore renames the `--destination` flag
to `--onto`.
The short name naturally becomes `-o`. That is perhaps a little
unfortunate because it's a common short name for `--output <file>`
arguments, but we don't use that anywhere so it seems fine.
Perhaps we should also rename `--source` (used by `rebase` and `fix`)
to something else. Perhaps the most obvious name is `--descendants`,
but the short form would be `-d`, which is of course already taken by
`--destination` in the case of `rebase`. Either way, I'm leaving that
rename for later. It would be good to do it before next release if we
are going to do it, though.
Closes#7941
Although we don't have "jj git tag set"/"delete" commands, this fixes weird undo
behavior #6325. The discussion in #6325 is derailed, but there would be another
issue for the "abandon unreachable" behavior.
Fixes#6325
Previously untracking a file with `jj file untrack` would not remove the
file from the git index (intent-to-add), making the output of
`jj status` and `git status` inconsistent.
New users (especially ones unfamiliar with CLI programs) intuitively
expect `jj undo` to work the same way the "undo" functionality of
typical GUI applications do. That means, running `jj undo` multiple
times should restore progressively older states of the repository
one-by-one.
Related feature request "jj undo ergonomics":
https://github.com/jj-vcs/jj/issues/3700
This paves the way for the semantics of `jj undo` and `jj op revert` to
evolve independently. `jj op revert` is going to stay the low-level
command to apply the inverse of any operation. The new name is
consistent with `jj revert`, which applies the inverse of a commit.
`jj undo` on the other hand is planned to become a higher-level command,
which is more similar to, say, Ctrl+Z in typical GUI applications.
Running `jj undo` repeatedly will revert progressively older operations,
allowing the user to walk backwards in time. At the same time, `jj undo`
will lose the abilitly to revert arbitrary operations, to keep its
semantics simple and intuitive.
Related feature request "jj undo ergonomics":
https://github.com/jj-vcs/jj/issues/3700
We hear every now and then from users who have run `git clean -fdx`
and accidentally delete their repo. Let's at least warn users about it
when the create a colocated repo.
We could perhaps allow the `.jj/` directory to be inside a `.git/`
directory like Sapling does, but that seems a little ugly and it's a
larger change.
There are two major goals:
1. garbage-collect predecessor commits referenced by immutable commits.
2. show operations alongside predecessors in "jj evolog".
The predecessors field will be removed from the Commit object. Maybe we can
also remove (writer side of) the extras table from GitBackend.
"jj evolog" will traverse the operation history to build an evolution
graph. This will be slower than the current implementation, but it seems
tolerable for mid-size repository stored in a local disk.
(when the page cache is warm)
% time jj op log -T'"."' --no-graph | wc -c
50459
jj op log -T'"."' --no-graph 0.12s user 0.31s system 103% cpu 0.418 total
Suppose we're interested in recent modifications, the traversal can often be
terminate early. I also have an idea for indexing originating operations.
https://github.com/jj-vcs/jj/pull/6405
For old operations which didn't record predecessors, "jj evolog" will fall back
to commit.predecessor_ids(). That's why commit_predecessors is Option<_>.
We haven't had any reports of problems from people who opted in. Since
it's early in the release cycle now, let's now test it on everyone who
builds from head, so we get almost a month of testing from those
people before it's enabled by default in a released version.
This impacts lots of test cases because the change-id header is added
to the Git commit. Most are uninteresting. `test_git_fetch` now sees
some divergent changes where it used to see only divergent bookmarks,
which makes sense.
Fix GHSA-794x-2rpg-rfgr.
`gix::Repository::work_dir` was renamed to `workdir` (though strangely
not the `gix::ThreadSafeRepository` version), and `lossy_config`
is now off by default in all configurations.
In colocated repos, we set up the Git index to make `git diff` closely
match `jj diff`. However, `git diff` will not include new files. We're
long talked about using the `git add --intent-to-add` feature to make
the match closer. This patch implements that. It does so both after
updating the working copy and after snapshotting. After updating the
working copy, the new file in the working-copy commit (compared to the
parent(s)) are marked as intent-to-add. After snapshotting, newly
snapshotted files are marked as intent-to-add, and deleted ones that
were previously marked as intent-to-add are removed from the index.
Closes#6122
I'm about to set the intent-to-add flag for newly added files. It's
also somewhat useful to see the index flags for conflict stages (the
different stages).
I'm going to add "[EOF]" marker to test that command output is terminated by
newline char. This patch ensures that callers who expect a raw output string
would never be affected by any normalization passes.
Some common normalization functions are extracted as CommandOutputString
methods.
Forgetting remote bookmarks can lead to surprising behavior since it
causes the repo state to become out-of-sync with the remote until the
next `jj git fetch`. Untracking the bookmarks should be a simpler and
more intuitive default behavior. The old behavior is still available
with the `--include-remotes` flag.
I also changed the displayed number of forgotten branches. Previously
when forgetting "bookmark", "bookmark@remote", and "bookmark@git" it
would display `Forgot 1 bookmarks`, but I think this would be confusing
with the new flag since the user might think that `--include-remotes`
didn't work. Now it shows separate `Forgot N local bookmarks` and
`Forgot M remote bookmarks` messages when applicable.
With this change a warning is shown if the user does not explicitly specify the target revision, but the behavior is unchanged (it still defaults to the working copy).
In the future the warning will be turned into an error. In other words, it will be required to specify target revision.
The bulk of the changes here are to prepare tests for the upcoming change, to make the transition easier.
For additional details please see:
* https://github.com/jj-vcs/jj/issues/5374
* https://github.com/jj-vcs/jj/discussions/5363
If the parent tree contains conflicts, we want the index to also contain
a conflict to ensure that the use can't accidentally commit conflict
markers using `git commit`. Since we can't represent conflicts with more
than 2 sides in the Git index, we need to add a dummy conflict in this
case. We use ".jj-do-not-resolve-this-conflict" as the dummy conflict to
indicate to the user that they should not attempt to resolve this
conflict using Git.
Instead of setting the index to match the tree of HEAD, we now set the
index to the merged parent tree of the working copy commit. This means
that if you edit a merge commit, it will make the Git index look like it
would in the middle of a `git merge` operation (with all of the
successfully-merged files staged in the index).
If there are any 2-sided conflicts in the merged parent tree, then they
will be added to the index as conflicts. Since Git doesn't support
conflicts with more than 2 sides, many-sided conflicts are staged as the
first side of the conflict. The following commit will improve this.
These tests should still pass after we switch to gix for resetting the
index, so we need to make sure they don't rely on the cached index from
the `git2::Repository` instance.
