Since divergent/conflicted symbols no longer resolve to multiple revisions, it's
less scary to allow "large" revsets than before.
The config doc is removed because it's largely duplicated from the revsets doc,
and the config key will be removed.
#6016
There are two major goals:
1. garbage-collect predecessor commits referenced by immutable commits.
2. show operations alongside predecessors in "jj evolog".
The predecessors field will be removed from the Commit object. Maybe we can
also remove (writer side of) the extras table from GitBackend.
"jj evolog" will traverse the operation history to build an evolution
graph. This will be slower than the current implementation, but it seems
tolerable for mid-size repository stored in a local disk.
(when the page cache is warm)
% time jj op log -T'"."' --no-graph | wc -c
50459
jj op log -T'"."' --no-graph 0.12s user 0.31s system 103% cpu 0.418 total
Suppose we're interested in recent modifications, the traversal can often be
terminate early. I also have an idea for indexing originating operations.
https://github.com/jj-vcs/jj/pull/6405
For old operations which didn't record predecessors, "jj evolog" will fall back
to commit.predecessor_ids(). That's why commit_predecessors is Option<_>.
We haven't had any reports of problems from people who opted in. Since
it's early in the release cycle now, let's now test it on everyone who
builds from head, so we get almost a month of testing from those
people before it's enabled by default in a released version.
This impacts lots of test cases because the change-id header is added
to the Git commit. Most are uninteresting. `test_git_fetch` now sees
some divergent changes where it used to see only divergent bookmarks,
which makes sense.
Now that we depend on the `git` executable being available for `jj git
fetch/push` tests, we might as well use it for `jj util gc` tests
too.
I also switched to using the Git backend in
`cli/tests/test_file_track_untrack_commands.rs`, which seemed to be
using the local backend for no good reason.
I'm going to add "[EOF]" marker to test that command output is terminated by
newline char. This patch ensures that callers who expect a raw output string
would never be affected by any normalization passes.
Some common normalization functions are extracted as CommandOutputString
methods.
The working-copy revision is usually the latest commit, but it's not always
true. This patch ensures that the wc branch is emitted first so the graph node
order is less dependent on rewrites.
The recover commit we create in some cases (when an operation has been
lost) doesn't currently have a description. That makes it easy to miss
that it's special.
This removes an invalid View state from the root operation.
Note that the root index will have to be reindexed in order to resolve "root()"
in the root operation. I don't think this would practically matter, so this
patch doesn't bump the index version to invalidate the existing indexes.
See also 48a9f9ef56 "repo: use Transaction for creating repo-init operation."
This flag implements three modes:
- `copy`: copy sparse patterns from parent
- `full`: do not copy sparse patterns from parent
- `empty`: clear all paths, equal to `set --clear`
This is useful for various tooling like tools that want to run a parallel
process that queries the build system (without running into locks/blocking.)
I think continuing to copy sparse patterns makes sense as the default behavior.
Signed-off-by: Austin Seipp <aseipp@pobox.com>
It seems everyone agrees that `obslog` is not an intuitive name. There
was some discussion about alternatives in #3592 and on #4146. The
alternatives included `evolution`, `evolutionlog`, `evolog`,
`rewritelog`, `revlog`, and `changelog`. It seemed like
`evolution-log`/`evolog` was the most popular option. That also
matches the command's current help text ("Show how a change has
evolved over time").
"Concurrent" operations are not necessarily actually concurrent, so
"divergent" seems like a better name. And "reconcile" seems like a
better term for merging them, though we also sometimes use "merge".
Users may try to run `jj workspace add <name>` without specifying a
path, which results in the workspace being created in the current
directory. This can be confusing, since the workspace contents will also
be snapshotted in the original workspace if it is not sparse. Adding a
warning should reduce confusion in this case.
This is part of migrating away from legacy trees (with path-level
conflicts). I can't think of any practical impact (we already compare
the tree ids equal).
I'm going to fix misuse of CommandHelper::for_loaded_repo(), which expects
that the given repo respects the --at-operation option.
I don't think all of the added tests are useful, but "clone
--ignore-working-copy" might be legit as a replacement for bare repos.
The user probably would expect the path to be relative to their current
directory rather than the workspace root. For instance, if the user is
in a child directory and runs `jj workspace add ../../name`, then they
might be surprised if we printed "../name" instead of "../../name".
Forgetting a workspace removes its working-copy commit, so it makes
sense for it to be abandoned if it is discardable just like editing a
new commit will cause the old commit to be abandoned if it is
discardable.
It's common to create empty working-copy commits while using jj, and
currently the author timestamp for a commit is only set when it is first
created. If you create an empty commit, then don't work on a repo for a
few days, and then start working on a new feature without abandoning the
working-copy commit, the author timestamp will remain as the time the
commit was created rather than being updated to the time that work began
or finished.
This commit changes the behavior so that discardable commits (empty
commits with no description) by the current user have their author
timestamps reset when they are rewritten, meaning that the author
timestamp will become finalized whenever a commit is given a description
or becomes non-empty.
The error message that says something like 'Workspace "default"
doesn't have a working copy' confused me when I saw it. The problem
it's describing is that the repo view doesn't have a working-copy
commit for the given workspace id. Saying "working-copy commit"
instead of "working copy" hopefully clarifies it a bit.
When you use e.g. `git switch` to check out a conflicted commit,
you're going to end up with the `.jjconflicts-*` directories in your
working copy. It's probably not obvious what those mean. This patch
adds a README file to the root tree to try to explain to users what's
going on and how to recover.
The authoritative information about conflicts is stored in the
`jj:trees` commit header. The contents of conflicted commits is only
used for preventing GC. We can therefore add contents to the tree
without much consequence.
