Files
larksuite-cli/extension/platform/builder_test.go
sang-neo03 50b3f0a2af feat(platform): support multiple policy rules per plugin (#1182)
* feat(platform): support multiple policy rules per plugin

Extend the command policy framework from single-Rule to multi-Rule
semantics. A plugin (or policy.yml) may now contribute several scoped
Rules; the engine combines them with OR -- a command is allowed when it
satisfies every axis of at least one rule. This lets one integration
apply different risk ceilings and identity restrictions to different
command groups.

The cross-plugin fail-closed boundary is preserved: two distinct plugins
both calling Restrict still aborts startup (multiple_restrict_plugins).
Single-Rule behaviour is fully backward compatible -- the rejection
reason_code / rule_name / envelope shape are byte-for-byte unchanged;
multi-rule rejection surfaces the aggregate reason_code no_matching_rule.

- engine: New keeps single-rule compat, add NewSet for OR over rules
- resolver: dedupe by owner (one plugin may contribute many rules),
  return []*Rule; yaml gains a top-level rules: list
- registrar/builder/staging: Restrict may be called more than once;
  retire the double_restrict error
- config policy show / config plugins show: emit a rules array
- inventory: PluginEntry.Rules is now a slice (fixes last-rule-wins
  overwrite when a plugin contributes multiple rules)

* fix(platform): clone rules in Builder.Restrict and inventory snapshot

Address review feedback. Builder.Restrict stored the caller's *Rule
directly, so reusing and mutating one Rule object across multiple
Restrict calls collapsed entries to the last mutation; clone the rule and
its slices on append, mirroring the staging registrar.

BuildInventory likewise reused the source Allow/Deny/Identities slices;
copy them when building the RuleView snapshot instead of relying on
cloneInventory downstream.

Add a regression test: reusing and mutating one Rule across two Restrict
calls now yields two independent rules.

* fix(platform): skip yaml when a plugin owns policy; reject empty rules list

Two policy-config robustness fixes from review:

- A malformed ~/.lark-cli/policy.yml could abort a plugin-governed
  binary. applyUserPolicyPruning read yaml before resolving, and
  build.go fail-closes on any policy error when a plugin is present.
  Plugin rules shadow yaml anyway, so skip reading yaml entirely when a
  plugin contributed rules -- an unrelated broken file on the user's
  machine can no longer lock the CLI.

- A present-but-empty "rules: []" collapsed to a single all-zero Rule
  that allows every annotated command ("looks like policy, enforces
  almost nothing"). yaml.Parse now distinguishes absent from
  present-but-empty (Rules is a pointer) and rejects the empty list.

Add regression tests for both.
2026-05-30 17:05:33 +08:00

214 lines
7.0 KiB
Go

// Copyright (c) 2026 Lark Technologies Pte. Ltd.
// SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT
package platform_test
import (
"context"
"strings"
"testing"
"github.com/larksuite/cli/extension/platform"
)
// recorder Registrar captures everything a builder schedules so the
// test can assert what Install produced without involving the host.
type recorder struct {
observers int
wrappers int
lifecycles int
rule *platform.Rule // last rule (existing single-rule assertions)
rules []*platform.Rule // every rule, in Restrict order
}
func (r *recorder) Observe(platform.When, string, platform.Selector, platform.Observer) {
r.observers++
}
func (r *recorder) Wrap(string, platform.Selector, platform.Wrapper) { r.wrappers++ }
func (r *recorder) On(platform.LifecycleEvent, string, platform.LifecycleHandler) { r.lifecycles++ }
func (r *recorder) Restrict(rule *platform.Rule) {
r.rule = rule
r.rules = append(r.rules, rule)
}
// Restrict must snapshot each rule: a caller that reuses and mutates the
// same *Rule object across two Restrict calls must still get two distinct
// rules at Install time, not two pointers to the last mutation.
func TestBuilder_restrictClonesEachRule(t *testing.T) {
shared := &platform.Rule{Name: "docs-ro", Allow: []string{"docs/**"}, MaxRisk: platform.RiskRead}
b := platform.NewPlugin("p", "0").Restrict(shared)
// Reuse and mutate the same object, then register it again.
shared.Name = "im-rw"
shared.Allow[0] = "im/**"
shared.MaxRisk = platform.RiskWrite
p, err := b.Restrict(shared).Build()
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("Build: %v", err)
}
r := &recorder{}
if err := p.Install(r); err != nil {
t.Fatalf("Install: %v", err)
}
if len(r.rules) != 2 {
t.Fatalf("got %d rules, want 2", len(r.rules))
}
if r.rules[0].Name != "docs-ro" || r.rules[0].Allow[0] != "docs/**" || r.rules[0].MaxRisk != platform.RiskRead {
t.Errorf("rule[0] leaked later mutation: %+v", r.rules[0])
}
if r.rules[1].Name != "im-rw" || r.rules[1].Allow[0] != "im/**" {
t.Errorf("rule[1] = %+v, want im-rw / im/**", r.rules[1])
}
}
func TestBuilder_basicAssembly(t *testing.T) {
p, err := platform.NewPlugin("audit", "0.1.0").
Observer(platform.Before, "pre", platform.All(),
func(context.Context, platform.Invocation) {}).
Observer(platform.After, "post", platform.All(),
func(context.Context, platform.Invocation) {}).
Wrap("policy", platform.All(),
func(next platform.Handler) platform.Handler { return next }).
On(platform.Startup, "boot",
func(context.Context, *platform.LifecycleContext) error { return nil }).
FailOpen().
Build()
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("Build: %v", err)
}
if p.Name() != "audit" || p.Version() != "0.1.0" {
t.Errorf("metadata = %q/%q", p.Name(), p.Version())
}
if p.Capabilities().FailurePolicy != platform.FailOpen {
t.Errorf("FailurePolicy = %v, want FailOpen", p.Capabilities().FailurePolicy)
}
r := &recorder{}
if err := p.Install(r); err != nil {
t.Fatalf("Install: %v", err)
}
if r.observers != 2 || r.wrappers != 1 || r.lifecycles != 1 {
t.Errorf("Install dispatch = observers=%d wrappers=%d lifecycles=%d",
r.observers, r.wrappers, r.lifecycles)
}
}
// Restrict() flips Restricts=true and FailClosed automatically — a
// policy plugin can't accidentally ship under FailOpen.
func TestBuilder_restrictForcesFailClosed(t *testing.T) {
p, err := platform.NewPlugin("policy-plugin", "0.1.0").
Restrict(&platform.Rule{Name: "read-only", MaxRisk: platform.RiskRead}).
Build()
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("Build: %v", err)
}
caps := p.Capabilities()
if !caps.Restricts {
t.Errorf("Restricts = false, want true (Restrict() should flip it)")
}
if caps.FailurePolicy != platform.FailClosed {
t.Errorf("FailurePolicy = %v, want FailClosed (Restrict() implies it)", caps.FailurePolicy)
}
r := &recorder{}
if err := p.Install(r); err != nil {
t.Fatalf("Install: %v", err)
}
if r.rule == nil || r.rule.Name != "read-only" {
t.Errorf("Install did not propagate Rule: %+v", r.rule)
}
}
// Invalid name surfaces at Build time, not at NewPlugin.
func TestBuilder_invalidPluginName(t *testing.T) {
_, err := platform.NewPlugin("Has_Underscore_And_Caps", "0.1").Build()
if err == nil {
t.Fatalf("Build must reject malformed plugin name")
}
if !strings.Contains(err.Error(), "invalid plugin name") {
t.Errorf("error should mention plugin name, got: %v", err)
}
}
// Duplicate hookName within the same builder is rejected.
func TestBuilder_duplicateHookName(t *testing.T) {
noopObs := func(context.Context, platform.Invocation) {}
_, err := platform.NewPlugin("dup", "0").
Observer(platform.Before, "h", platform.All(), noopObs).
Observer(platform.After, "h", platform.All(), noopObs).
Build()
if err == nil {
t.Fatalf("Build must reject duplicate hookName")
}
if !strings.Contains(err.Error(), "already used") {
t.Errorf("error should mention duplicate hookName, got %v", err)
}
}
func TestBuilder_invalidHookName(t *testing.T) {
_, err := platform.NewPlugin("p", "0").
Observer(platform.Before, "Bad.Name", platform.All(),
func(context.Context, platform.Invocation) {}).
Build()
if err == nil {
t.Fatalf("Build must reject hookName with dot")
}
}
// MustBuild panics on builder error.
func TestBuilder_mustBuildPanicsOnError(t *testing.T) {
defer func() {
if r := recover(); r == nil {
t.Fatalf("MustBuild must panic when Build would fail")
}
}()
_ = platform.NewPlugin("BadName", "0").MustBuild()
}
func TestBuilder_restrictNilRejected(t *testing.T) {
_, err := platform.NewPlugin("p", "0").Restrict(nil).Build()
if err == nil {
t.Fatalf("Restrict(nil) must produce error")
}
}
func TestBuilder_capabilitiesSetters(t *testing.T) {
p, err := platform.NewPlugin("p", "0.1").
RequireCLI(">=1.0.0").
FailClosed().
Build()
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("Build: %v", err)
}
caps := p.Capabilities()
if caps.RequiredCLIVersion != ">=1.0.0" {
t.Errorf("RequiredCLIVersion = %q, want >=1.0.0", caps.RequiredCLIVersion)
}
if caps.FailurePolicy != platform.FailClosed {
t.Errorf("FailurePolicy = %v, want FailClosed", caps.FailurePolicy)
}
}
func TestBuilder_restrictThenFailOpenRejected(t *testing.T) {
rule := &platform.Rule{Name: "r", MaxRisk: platform.RiskRead}
_, err := platform.NewPlugin("p", "0").Restrict(rule).FailOpen().Build()
if err == nil {
t.Fatalf("Build must reject Restrict()+FailOpen() mismatch")
}
if !strings.Contains(err.Error(), "FailClosed") {
t.Errorf("error should mention FailClosed, got: %v", err)
}
}
// Restrict() flips FailurePolicy to FailClosed; the previous FailOpen()
// is overridden. Pin it so the Build-time validation does not over-reject.
func TestBuilder_failOpenThenRestrictOK(t *testing.T) {
rule := &platform.Rule{Name: "r", MaxRisk: platform.RiskRead}
p, err := platform.NewPlugin("p", "0").FailOpen().Restrict(rule).Build()
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("FailOpen()+Restrict() must succeed (Restrict flips to FailClosed): %v", err)
}
if p.Capabilities().FailurePolicy != platform.FailClosed {
t.Errorf("FailurePolicy = %v, want FailClosed", p.Capabilities().FailurePolicy)
}
}