* feat(extensions): add assess idea assessment pipeline extension Add a role-neutral, opt-in "Idea Assessment Pipeline" extension (id: assess) covering the discovery work that happens BEFORE spec-driven development. It provides a five-stage funnel: intake, research, define, shape, decide, each writing one artifact under .specify/assessments/<slug>/. A go verdict hands off to /speckit.specify; killing an idea is a first-class success outcome. Registration: - extensions/catalog.json: bundled core opt-in entry (before bug) - pyproject.toml: force-include maps into core_pack so it ships in the installed wheel (verified via wheel build) Also normalizes a Rich-wrapped substring assertion in test_workflows.py so the suite passes at CI's 80-column non-TTY width. Assisted-by: GitHub Copilot (model: Claude Opus 4.8, supervised) Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> Copilot-Session: 1f25cf9d-b7eb-4b2b-b811-3e91d8db8f6a * fix(extensions): address PR review on assess extension Resolve review feedback on github/spec-kit#3568: - catalog.json: bump top-level updated_at to this revision (2026-07-17) - extension.yml + catalog.json: shorten the assess description to under the documented 200-char manifest limit (kept aligned across both) - extension.yml: make the before_specify hook prompt condition-neutral (it fires on every /speckit.specify, so it must not claim "no assessment found") - intake.md: fix slug normalization to explicitly allow lowercase letters a-z (the old rule permitted only digits and '-', contradicting the offline-mode example) - intake.md + research.md: require a sanitized source URL (strip userinfo and credential/signature query params) instead of persisting a verbatim URL that could leak secrets into project artifacts - decide.md: remove the "trivially small" exception so a go always requires a shaped concept, making verdict behavior deterministic and consistent with the guardrails and README Assisted-by: GitHub Copilot (model: Claude Opus 4.8, supervised) Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> Copilot-Session: 1f25cf9d-b7eb-4b2b-b811-3e91d8db8f6a * refactor(extensions): remove before_specify hook from assess Assess is a separate business process from spec-driven development, so it should not inject itself into the /speckit.specify lifecycle. The hook fired on every /speckit.specify invocation (it had no condition), nagging even when an assessment already existed and the user was deliberately proceeding. Unlike git's before_specify (a mechanical prerequisite: create a feature branch) or agent-context's after_* hooks (reacting to spec output), assess is an upstream, optional, human-judgment process. The coupling that belongs here already runs forward and by choice: a `go` verdict from /speckit.assess.decide hands off to /speckit.specify. The backward hook was the redundant, intrusive direction. - extension.yml: drop the hooks block (commands-only manifest) - README.md: replace the Hooks section with a Handoff section - test: replace the hook assertion with test_declares_no_hooks to lock in the standalone-pipeline design Assisted-by: GitHub Copilot (model: Claude Opus 4.8, supervised) Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> Copilot-Session: 1f25cf9d-b7eb-4b2b-b811-3e91d8db8f6a * fix(extensions): harden assess slug handling and clarify verdict logic Address the second review round on github/spec-kit#3568: - Slug path traversal: intake and all four downstream commands (research, define, shape, decide) now normalize an explicit or user-supplied slug to the [a-z0-9-] alphabet (dropping '.', '/', '\\') and reject an empty normalized result before constructing ASSESS_DIR. This guarantees a slug like `../..` cannot escape .specify/assessments/. - Metadata accuracy: the extension.yml and catalog.json descriptions no longer imply a "build/kill" call is handed to /speckit.specify — only a `go` hands off; a `kill` closes the assessment. - Verdict determinism (decide): a `go` now explicitly requires evidence strength `adequate`+ (never weak/unknown), resolving the conflict with the thin-evidence guardrail. - Risk polarity (decide): renamed the "Risk" criterion to "Risk posture" with positive polarity (strong = risks understood and mitigated) so it composes with the other scores that feed the verdict. - README: aligned the go-threshold guardrail with the evidence rule and documented the slug-normalization safety property. The PR description was also updated to drop the stale before_specify hook claim (the hook was removed in the previous commit). Assisted-by: GitHub Copilot (model: Claude Opus 4.8, supervised) Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> Copilot-Session: 1f25cf9d-b7eb-4b2b-b811-3e91d8db8f6a * fix(extensions): add symlink/realpath containment and pin research host allowlist Address the third review round on github/spec-kit#3568: - Path safety (intake, research, define, shape, decide): slug normalization blocks lexical `..` but not symlinked path components. Each command now, before any mkdir/read/write, resolves the real path of .specify/assessments/<slug>/ and every artifact, refuses to follow a symlinked .specify / assessments / slug dir / artifact, and verifies the resolved path stays inside the project root. This blocks a cloned or crafted project from redirecting reads/writes outside the repository. Each stage enforces this independently since research/define/decide can run without intake. - research URL policy: replaced the open-ended "and comparable well-known hosts" no-prompt branch with intake's exact enumerated allowlist, so an agent cannot classify an attacker-controlled host as "comparable" and fetch it without confirmation. - README: guardrail now documents symlink/realpath containment. Assisted-by: GitHub Copilot (model: Claude Opus 4.8, supervised) Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> Copilot-Session: 1f25cf9d-b7eb-4b2b-b811-3e91d8db8f6a * fix(extensions): redact secrets in captured idea and stop on explicit-slug collision Address the fourth review round on github/spec-kit#3568 (intake): - Secret leak in the captured idea: quoting the original "verbatim" contradicted the URL sanitization rule when the idea itself contained a credential-bearing URL. Capture now redacts secrets (sanitize URLs; strip tokens, passwords, keys, cookies) inside the quoted text as well as the Source field, and the section heading is "Idea (as captured)" rather than "verbatim". - Explicit-slug collision: in automated mode an existing intake.md caused a silent switch to a new slug, contradicting the no-suffix guarantee for user-provided slugs. Now: user-provided slug collision -> stop and report; only a self-generated slug (already disambiguated at resolution) is re-slugged. Assisted-by: GitHub Copilot (model: Claude Opus 4.8, supervised) Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> Copilot-Session: 1f25cf9d-b7eb-4b2b-b811-3e91d8db8f6a * fix(extensions): reject IPv6 private ranges and DNS-rebinding in URL policy Address the remaining open comment from review 4722852090 on github/spec-kit#3568 (the other six comments in that round were already resolved by the slug-validation and host-allowlist fixes in9cd07fbandc032a2e). The URL Trust Policy refused only textual IPv4 loopback/RFC1918/metadata hosts, so an approved hostname resolving to an internal IPv6 or IPv4-mapped address could still reach internal services. The refuse- outright list now covers IPv6 link-local (fe80::/10), unique-local (fc00::/7), IPv4-mapped forms, and the IPv6 metadata address, and adds a resolution-time check: even an allowlisted or user-confirmed host is refused when it resolves to any non-public address, defeating DNS rebinding. Mirrored the summary in research's inherited-policy note. Assisted-by: GitHub Copilot (model: Claude Opus 4.8, supervised) Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> Copilot-Session: 1f25cf9d-b7eb-4b2b-b811-3e91d8db8f6a * fix(extensions): pin connection vs DNS rebinding and gate slug-only direct entry Address the fifth review round on github/spec-kit#3568: - DNS rebinding (intake + research): a standalone DNS lookup does not defeat rebinding because the fetch client can re-resolve or pick a private address from a mixed answer. The policy now requires the fetch to pin the connection to a validated public address (or verify the connected peer) and re-apply the refusal ranges to the address actually connected to; if the fetch mechanism cannot pin or expose the peer, the fetch is refused rather than trusted by hostname. - Slug-only direct entry (research + define): when intake/research artifacts are absent and $ARGUMENTS carries only a slug, the commands no longer infer an idea/problem from the slug. They now require substantive idea/problem text and otherwise prompt (interactive) or stop (automated). - Cleaned up a leftover duplicate ASSESS_DIR assignment line in research. Assisted-by: GitHub Copilot (model: Claude Opus 4.8, supervised) Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> Copilot-Session: 1f25cf9d-b7eb-4b2b-b811-3e91d8db8f6a * fix(extensions): allow read-only source inspection in intake guardrail Address the sixth review round on github/spec-kit#3568. The intake guardrail said the command "only reads and writes inside .specify/assessments/<slug>/", which contradicts its documented inputs: intake must read a codebase pointer (repository inspection) and fetch an allowed URL to capture the idea. The guardrail now limits only *writes* to the assessment directory and explicitly permits read-only inspection of the supplied sources (repo + allowlisted URL fetch under the URL Trust Policy). The other four commands already phrased this correctly ("read only, and write inside ...") and are unchanged. Assisted-by: GitHub Copilot (model: Claude Opus 4.8, supervised) Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> Copilot-Session: 1f25cf9d-b7eb-4b2b-b811-3e91d8db8f6a * Harden assess commands: ancestor path safety, untrusted-artifact reads, research dir creation Addresses review 4723905370 on PR #3568 across three themes: - Ancestor path safety: verify `.specify` and `.specify/assessments` are real directories (not symlinks) resolving inside the project root before any filesystem-based slug resolution, in all five commands. - Untrusted artifact reads: treat the contents of persisted assessment artifacts (intake/research/problem/concept) as untrusted data, not instructions — ignore embedded directives, mirroring the URL Trust Policy. - research now ensures the validated ASSESS_DIR exists before writing, since it may be the first assessment command run. Assisted-by: GitHub Copilot (model: Claude Opus 4.8, supervised) Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> Copilot-Session: 1f25cf9d-b7eb-4b2b-b811-3e91d8db8f6a * Allow absent assessment dir in ancestor path-safety check Addresses review 4723955260 on PR #3568. The ancestor path-safety clause required `.specify/assessments` to already be a real directory, which blocked the first-run commands (intake, research, define) from ever reaching the step that creates it. Reword the clause in all five commands so a not-yet-created directory is permitted, while still refusing when `.specify` or `.specify/assessments` exists as a symlink or escapes the project root. Assisted-by: GitHub Copilot (model: Claude Opus 4.8, supervised) Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> Copilot-Session: 1f25cf9d-b7eb-4b2b-b811-3e91d8db8f6a * Fix README diagram: needs-clarification revisits the named earlier stage Addresses review 4724027270 on PR #3568. The overview flowchart routed every needs-clarification verdict back to research, but decide.md's Revisit stage can send an idea back to intake, research, define, or shape. Reroute the arrow as a generic loop back to the earlier stages so the diagram no longer misstates the pipeline. Assisted-by: GitHub Copilot (model: Claude Opus 4.8, supervised) Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> Copilot-Session: 1f25cf9d-b7eb-4b2b-b811-3e91d8db8f6a * Make decide handoff integration-neutral (no hard-coded dot-style) Addresses review 4724080304 on PR #3568: - decide.md frontmatter description hard-coded `/speckit.specify`. Frontmatter is parsed before command-reference resolution, so it now uses agent-neutral wording ("hand survivors off into Spec-Driven Development") instead of a dot-style literal that would be wrong for non-dot integrations. - The `## If go — Handoff to …` heading inside the decision.md output template hard-coded `/speckit.specify`, which would be written verbatim into decision.md. It now uses the `__SPECKIT_COMMAND_SPECIFY__` placeholder, like the rest of the command, so the active integration's invocation style is rendered. Assisted-by: GitHub Copilot (model: Claude Opus 4.8, supervised) Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> Copilot-Session: 1f25cf9d-b7eb-4b2b-b811-3e91d8db8f6a --------- Co-authored-by: Copilot App <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
An open source toolkit for building high-quality software with any AI coding agent — a ready-to-use spec-driven process (or bring your own), endlessly extensible, community-driven, and built for your whole organization.
Table of Contents
- 🤔 What is Spec-Driven Development?
- ⚡ Get Started
- 📽️ Video Overview
- 🌍 Community
- 🤖 Supported AI Coding Agent Integrations
- 🔧 Specify CLI Reference
- 🧩 Making Spec Kit Your Own: Extensions & Presets
- 📦 Bundles: Role-Based Setups
- 📚 Core Philosophy
- 🌟 Development Phases
- 🎯 Experimental Goals
- 🔧 Prerequisites
- 📖 Learn More
- 💬 Support
- 🙏 Acknowledgements
- 📄 License
🤔 What is Spec-Driven Development?
Spec-Driven Development flips the script on traditional software development. For decades, code has been king — specifications were just scaffolding we built and discarded once the "real work" of coding began. Spec-Driven Development changes this: specifications become executable, directly generating working implementations rather than just guiding them.
⚡ Get Started
1. Install Specify CLI
Requires uv (install uv). Replace vX.Y.Z with the latest release tag from Releases — keep the leading v (for example, v0.12.11, not 0.12.11):
uv tool install specify-cli --from git+https://github.com/github/spec-kit.git@vX.Y.Z
Prefer installing from PyPI? The specify-cli package is also published there:
uv tool install specify-cli
See the Installation Guide for alternative methods, verification, upgrade, and troubleshooting.
2. Initialize a project
specify init my-project --integration copilot
cd my-project
To check for updates or upgrade the installed CLI, use the self-management commands. See the Upgrade Guide for detailed scenarios and customization options.
# Check whether a newer release is available (read-only — does not modify anything)
specify self check
# Preview what would run, without actually upgrading
specify self upgrade --dry-run
# Upgrade in place to the latest stable release (auto-detects uv tool vs pipx install)
specify self upgrade
# Or pin a specific release tag (replace vX.Y.Z[suffix] with your desired release tag)
specify self upgrade --tag vX.Y.Z[suffix]
Bare specify self upgrade executes immediately, matching the no-prompt behavior of commands like pip install -U and npm update. For uv tool installs, it runs uv tool install specify-cli --force --from <git ref> under the hood so pinned release tags work, including dev, alpha/beta/rc, or build metadata suffixes. uvx (ephemeral) runs and source checkouts are detected and produce path-specific guidance instead of running an installer. Set SPECIFY_UPGRADE_TIMEOUT_SECS to cap how long the installer subprocess may run (default: no timeout — interrupt with Ctrl+C if needed).
3. Establish project principles
Launch your coding agent in the project directory. Most agents expose spec-kit as /speckit.* slash commands; Codex CLI in skills mode uses $speckit-* instead; GitHub Copilot CLI uses /agents to select the agent or address it directly in a prompt.
Use the /speckit.constitution command to create your project's governing principles and development guidelines that will guide all subsequent development.
/speckit.constitution Create principles focused on code quality, testing standards, user experience consistency, and performance requirements
4. Create the spec
Use the /speckit.specify command to describe what you want to build. Focus on the what and why, not the tech stack.
/speckit.specify Build an application that can help me organize my photos in separate photo albums. Albums are grouped by date and can be re-organized by dragging and dropping on the main page. Albums are never in other nested albums. Within each album, photos are previewed in a tile-like interface.
5. Create a technical implementation plan
Use the /speckit.plan command to provide your tech stack and architecture choices.
/speckit.plan The application uses Vite with minimal number of libraries. Use vanilla HTML, CSS, and JavaScript as much as possible. Images are not uploaded anywhere and metadata is stored in a local SQLite database.
6. Break down into tasks
Use /speckit.tasks to create an actionable task list from your implementation plan.
/speckit.tasks
7. Execute implementation
Use /speckit.implement to execute all tasks and build your feature according to the plan.
/speckit.implement
For detailed step-by-step instructions, see our comprehensive guide.
📽️ Video Overview
Want to see Spec Kit in action? Watch our video overview!
🌍 Community
Explore community-contributed resources on the Spec Kit docs site:
- Extensions — commands, hooks, and capabilities
- Presets — template and terminology overrides
- Bundles — role and team stacks composed from existing components
- Walkthroughs — end-to-end SDD scenarios
- Friends — projects that extend or build on Spec Kit
Note
Community contributions are independently created and maintained by their respective authors. Review source code before installation and use at your own discretion.
Want to contribute? See the Extension Publishing Guide, the Presets Publishing Guide, or the Community Bundles guide.
🤖 Supported AI Coding Agent Integrations
Spec Kit works with 30+ AI coding agents — both CLI tools and IDE-based assistants. See the full list with notes and usage details in the Supported AI Coding Agent Integrations guide.
Run specify integration list to see all available integrations in your installed version.
Available Slash Commands
After running specify init, your AI coding agent will have access to these slash commands for structured development. For integrations that support skills mode, passing --integration <agent> --integration-options="--skills" installs agent skills instead of slash-command prompt files.
Core Commands
Essential commands for the Spec-Driven Development workflow:
| Command | Agent Skill | Description |
|---|---|---|
/speckit.constitution |
speckit-constitution |
Create or update project governing principles and development guidelines |
/speckit.specify |
speckit-specify |
Define what you want to build (requirements and user stories) |
/speckit.plan |
speckit-plan |
Create technical implementation plans with your chosen tech stack |
/speckit.tasks |
speckit-tasks |
Generate actionable task lists for implementation |
/speckit.taskstoissues |
speckit-taskstoissues |
Convert generated task lists into GitHub issues for tracking and execution |
/speckit.implement |
speckit-implement |
Execute all tasks to build the feature according to the plan |
/speckit.converge |
speckit-converge |
Assess the codebase against spec/plan/tasks and append remaining work as new tasks |
Optional Commands
Additional commands for enhanced quality and validation:
| Command | Agent Skill | Description |
|---|---|---|
/speckit.clarify |
speckit-clarify |
Clarify underspecified areas (recommended before /speckit.plan; formerly /quizme) |
/speckit.analyze |
speckit-analyze |
Cross-artifact consistency & coverage analysis (run after /speckit.tasks, before /speckit.implement) |
/speckit.checklist |
speckit-checklist |
Generate custom quality checklists that validate requirements completeness, clarity, and consistency (like "unit tests for English") |
🔧 Specify CLI Reference
For full command details, options, and examples, see the CLI Reference.
🧩 Making Spec Kit Your Own: Extensions & Presets
Spec Kit can be tailored to your needs through two complementary systems — extensions and presets — plus project-local overrides for one-off adjustments:
| Priority | Component Type | Location |
|---|---|---|
| ⬆ 1 | Project-Local Overrides | .specify/templates/overrides/ |
| 2 | Presets — Customize core & extensions | .specify/presets/templates/ |
| 3 | Extensions — Add new capabilities | .specify/extensions/templates/ |
| ⬇ 4 | Spec Kit Core — Built-in SDD commands & templates | .specify/templates/ |
- Templates are resolved at runtime — Spec Kit walks the stack top-down and uses the first match.
- Project-local overrides (
.specify/templates/overrides/) let you make one-off adjustments for a single project without creating a full preset. - Extension/preset commands are applied at install time — when you run
specify extension addorspecify preset add, command files are written into agent directories (e.g.,.claude/commands/). - If multiple presets or extensions provide the same command, the highest-priority version wins. On removal, the next-highest-priority version is restored automatically.
- If no overrides or customizations exist, Spec Kit uses its core defaults.
Extensions — Add New Capabilities
Use extensions when you need functionality that goes beyond Spec Kit's core. Extensions introduce new commands and templates — for example, adding domain-specific workflows that are not covered by the built-in SDD commands, integrating with external tools, or adding entirely new development phases. They expand what Spec Kit can do.
# Search available extensions
specify extension search
# Install an extension
specify extension add <extension-name>
For example, extensions could add Jira integration, post-implementation code review, V-Model test traceability, or project health diagnostics.
See the Extensions reference for the full command guide. Browse the community extensions for what's available.
Presets — Customize Existing Workflows
Use presets when you want to change how Spec Kit works without adding new capabilities. Presets override the templates and commands that ship with the core and with installed extensions — for example, enforcing a compliance-oriented spec format, using domain-specific terminology, or applying organizational standards to plans and tasks. They customize the artifacts and instructions that Spec Kit and its extensions produce.
# Search available presets
specify preset search
# Install a preset
specify preset add <preset-name>
For example, presets could restructure spec templates to require regulatory traceability, adapt the workflow to fit the methodology you use (e.g., Agile, Kanban, Waterfall, jobs-to-be-done, or domain-driven design), add mandatory security review gates to plans, enforce test-first task ordering, or localize the entire workflow to a different language. The pirate-speak demo shows just how deep the customization can go. Multiple presets can be stacked with priority ordering.
See the Presets reference for the full command guide, including resolution order and priority stacking.
📦 Bundles: Role-Based Setups
Extensions and presets are individual building blocks. A bundle packages a curated set of them — extensions, presets, steps, and workflows — into a single, versioned, role-oriented setup so a whole team persona (product manager, business analyst, security researcher, developer, …) can be provisioned with one command.
A bundle is described by a hand-written bundle.yml manifest. It pins each
component to a version and, optionally, targets a specific integration; a bundle
with no integration is agnostic and inherits whatever integration the
project already uses.
# Discover bundles in the active catalog stack
specify bundle search [<query>]
# Inspect the exact component set a bundle will add (equals what install does)
specify bundle info <bundle-id>
# Install a bundle's full component set in one operation
specify bundle install <bundle-id>
# See what's installed, then update or remove non-destructively
specify bundle list
specify bundle update <bundle-id> # or --all
specify bundle remove <bundle-id> # removes only this bundle's components
Bundles resolve from a priority-ordered catalog stack (project > user >
built-in). Each source carries an install policy: install-allowed sources can
be installed from, while discovery-only sources are visible in search/info
but refuse installation. Manage the stack with specify bundle catalog list|add|remove.
Authors validate and package bundles locally. Distribution is hosting the built artifact and adding a catalog source; community bundle submissions use the Bundle Submission issue template so required component catalogs and install evidence can be reviewed:
specify bundle validate --path ./my-bundle # structural + reference checks
specify bundle build --path ./my-bundle # produce a versioned .zip artifact
Four ready-to-read example manifests live under
examples/bundles/ (product manager, business analyst,
security researcher, developer).
Key guarantees: info shows exactly what install adds (transparency);
installs are idempotent and confined to the project root; remove never touches
components another installed bundle still needs; and all consume/author commands
work offline against local or pinned sources.
When to Use Which
| Goal | Use |
|---|---|
| Add a brand-new command or workflow | Extension |
| Customize the format of specs, plans, or tasks | Preset |
| Integrate an external tool or service | Extension |
| Enforce organizational or regulatory standards | Preset |
| Ship reusable domain-specific templates | Either — presets for template overrides, extensions for templates bundled with new commands |
| Provision a complete role-based setup in one command | Bundle |
📚 Core Philosophy
Spec-Driven Development is a structured process that emphasizes:
- Intent-driven development where specifications define the "what" before the "how"
- Rich specification creation using guardrails and organizational principles
- Multi-step refinement rather than one-shot code generation from prompts
- Heavy reliance on advanced AI model capabilities for specification interpretation
🌟 Development Phases
| Phase | Focus | Key Activities |
|---|---|---|
| 0-to-1 Development ("Greenfield") | Generate from scratch |
|
| Creative Exploration | Parallel implementations |
|
| Iterative Enhancement ("Brownfield") | Brownfield modernization |
|
For existing projects, keep Spec Kit tooling updates separate from feature
artifact evolution: refresh managed project files when upgrading, and update
specs/ artifacts when intended behavior changes. The
Evolving Specs guide describes the
recommended brownfield loop.
🎯 Experimental Goals
Our research and experimentation focus on:
Technology independence
- Create applications using diverse technology stacks
- Validate the hypothesis that Spec-Driven Development is a process not tied to specific technologies, programming languages, or frameworks
Enterprise constraints
- Demonstrate mission-critical application development
- Incorporate organizational constraints (cloud providers, tech stacks, engineering practices)
- Support enterprise design systems and compliance requirements
User-centric development
- Build applications for different user cohorts and preferences
- Support various development approaches (from vibe-coding to AI-native development)
Creative & iterative processes
- Validate the concept of parallel implementation exploration
- Provide robust iterative feature development workflows
- Extend processes to handle upgrades and modernization tasks
🔧 Prerequisites
- Linux/macOS/Windows
- Supported AI coding agent.
- uv for package management (recommended) or pipx for persistent installation
- Python 3.11+
- Git
If you encounter issues with an agent, please open an issue so we can refine the integration.
📖 Learn More
- Complete Spec-Driven Development Methodology - Deep dive into the full process
- Quick Start Guide - Step-by-step implementation walkthrough
💬 Support
For support, please open a GitHub issue. We welcome bug reports, feature requests, and questions about using Spec-Driven Development.
🙏 Acknowledgements
This project is heavily influenced by and based on the work and research of John Lam.
📄 License
This project is licensed under the terms of the MIT open source license. Please refer to the LICENSE file for the full terms.

