mirror of
https://github.com/github/spec-kit.git
synced 2026-08-03 06:26:30 +08:00
a9c9905400
* fix(workflows): reject non-string 'condition' in if/while/do-while steps
`if_then`, `while_loop`, and `do_while` validate() confirm `condition` is
present but never that it is a string. execute() feeds it to
`evaluate_condition()`, which returns a non-string as-is and takes `bool()`
of it -- so `condition: [1, 2]` (a list authoring mistake) silently resolves
to `True`, branching wrongly / spinning the loop to `max_iterations`, with no
error reported.
Reject a present-but-non-string `condition` at validation, mirroring the
existing prompt/shell/command 'must be a string' guards. `"true"`/`"false"`
and expressions like `"{{ ... }}"` are strings, so they stay valid.
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
* docs(workflows): describe the evaluate_expression/evaluate_condition split accurately
Address review feedback: the guard comments attributed the non-string
pass-through to evaluate_condition(), which always returns a bool. It is
evaluate_expression() (called by evaluate_condition) that returns a non-string
unchanged; evaluate_condition then applies bool() to that value.
Reword all four sites (if/while/do-while guards + the mirror test comment) to
name the two stages correctly. Comments only -- no behaviour change.
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
* fix(workflows): keep a literal bool 'condition' valid
Self-review catch: the guard rejected EVERY non-string, which broke an input
that previously worked. An unquoted ``condition: false`` is idiomatic YAML and
resolves exactly today -- evaluate_expression passes the bool through and
evaluate_condition's bool() is a no-op (verified: evaluate_condition(False) is
False, (True) is True). The if/while steps even default ``condition`` to the
bool ``False`` themselves, so bool is the field's natural type, not an
authoring mistake.
Accept (str, bool) and reject only the genuinely silent-coercion types
(list/dict/int/float, e.g. condition: [1, 2] is always True). Message updated
to "must be a string or boolean"; the bad-value tests drop True and gain 1.5,
and each step gains a positive bool case.
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
568 KiB
568 KiB