Markus Wondrak d6fa0460ed feat(workflows): WorkflowResolver standalone (PR 1) (#3557)
* feat(workflows): add standalone WorkflowResolver and overlay subsystem

Implement PR 1 of the workflow-overlays plan: a concrete, standalone
WorkflowResolver for downstream workflow extensibility without touching the
Preset subsystem.

- Add overlay manifest schema (Overlay, OverlayEdit, validate_overlay_yaml)
- Add pure-function merge engine (find_step, apply_edit, merge_steps,
  validate_edits) with recursive anchor search and higher-wins semantics
- Add StepListComposer and tiered layer sources (project, installed, base)
- Add WorkflowResolver facade with inline HIGHER_WINS priority sorting
- Add CLI verbs: workflow overlay add/set-priority/enable/disable/remove/list
  and workflow resolve <id>
- Wire WorkflowEngine.load_workflow through WorkflowResolver
- Extend workflow add to copy optional overlays/ subdirectory from local
  workflow directories
- Add comprehensive unit, integration, and security tests

Refs: discussion #3473 (https://github.com/github/spec-kit/discussions/3473)

Assisted-by: Kimi (model: opencode-go/kimi-k2.7-code, autonomous)

* fix(workflows): reject symlinked overlay directories in layer sources

Address PR #3557 review comments r3594064534 and r3594064563:

- ProjectOverlaySource.collect now rejects symlinked per-workflow overlay
  directories (.specify/workflows/overlays/<id>) before iterating
- InstalledOverlaySource.collect now rejects symlinked installed overlay
  directories (.specify/workflows/<id>/overlays) before iterating
- workflow_overlay_list catches ValueError from resolver and exits with
  code 1 instead of crashing on unhandled exceptions
- Added .specify/workflows/overlays to _reject_unsafe_workflow_storage
  chokepoint for defense-in-depth

These guards prevent symlinked overlay directories from redirecting
auto-loaded overlay YAML to attacker-controlled content outside the
project, which could inject executable shell steps into trusted workflows.

Refs: PR #3557 review comments r3594064534, r3594064563

Assisted-by: opencode-go/qwen3.7-max (autonomous)

* fix(workflows): address Copilot review findings in merge engine

- Apply inserts before winning replace to prevent anchor-not-found errors
  when replace changes step ID (r3594064604)
- Track attribution recursively for nested steps in composite inserts/replaces
  so workflow resolve attributes all child steps correctly (r3594064638)
- Add regression tests for both fixes

Refs: PR #3557 review discussion

Assisted-by: GitHub Copilot (model: qwen3.7-plus, autonomous)

* refactor(workflows): simplify overlay architecture to 2-tier

Remove installed overlays tier to enforce clean separation of concerns:
- workflow add installs workflows only (no overlay copying)
- workflow overlay add installs overlays only (project-local)

Changes:
- Remove InstalledOverlaySource class and all references
- Remove overlay-copying logic from _validate_and_install_local()
- Update WorkflowResolver to 2-tier: project overlays + base workflow
- Fix --priority override timing: apply before validation, not after
- Remove tests for installed overlays (no longer applicable)

Rationale: If upstream controls both base workflow and shipped overlays,
and both get overwritten on bundle update, there's no reason to ship
overlays separately. Overlays only make sense when someone other than
the base author adds them.

Resolves all three review findings from PR #3557:
- r3594064677: workflow add no longer copies overlays from all call sites
- r3594064705: --priority override now applied before validation
- r3594064726: no stale installed overlays (tier removed entirely)

Assisted-by: Claude (model: claude-opus-4-7, autonomous)

* fix(workflows): harden overlay symlink handling

Assisted-by: GitHub Copilot (model: GPT-5.4, autonomous)

Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>

* docs(workflows): remove stale installed-overlay references from workflows.md

The 2-tier refactor (cc28185) removed the installed-overlay tier entirely,
but docs/reference/workflows.md was not updated. This commit addresses all
four Cluster 2 findings from the PR review:

- workflow add: remove sentence about copying overlays/ subdirectory
- How Overlays Work: drop installed-overlay table row and precedence prose;
  rewrite to 2-tier model (project overlays only, source-order tie-break)
- overlay remove: drop trailing sentence about installed overlays
- Interaction with Bundles: rewrite to say workflow add installs only
  workflow.yml; remove installed-overlay discovery language

Fixes: r3596368791, r3596368831, r3596368873, r3596368919

Assisted-by: GitHub Copilot (model: claude-sonnet-4.6, autonomous)
Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix(overlays): detect ancestor-conflict anchors in merge_steps

When two overlay edits target anchors that share a parent/descendant
relationship (e.g. remove an if-step + insert_after a nested child),
merge_steps processed them independently and in dict-insertion order,
making the outcome non-deterministic.

Add two private helpers to merge.py:
- _descendant_ids(step): returns all step IDs nested inside a step dict
  by delegating to the existing _all_base_step_ids helper on children.
- _check_anchor_conflicts(anchors, base_steps): for each targeted anchor
  finds its descendants and checks whether any other targeted anchor is
  among them; returns human-readable error strings.

Wire _check_anchor_conflicts into merge_steps immediately after
edits_by_anchor is built, before any tree mutation occurs. Raises
ValueError listing the conflicting anchor pair(s) so overlay authors
know exactly what to fix.

Add TestMergeStepsAncestorConflicts (6 cases):
- remove parent + insert_after child raises ValueError
- replace parent + remove child raises ValueError
- conflict across multiple overlays raises ValueError
- sibling anchors (not ancestor/descendant) pass
- single anchor passes
- parent targeted but child not targeted passes

Closes review comment r3596368746 (PR #3557, round 2, cluster 3).

Assisted-by: GitHub Copilot (model: claude-sonnet-4.6, autonomous)
Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix(overlays): fix over-broad conflict detection and non-deterministic ID collision

Finding 1.1 — _check_anchor_conflicts was rejecting any ancestor/descendant
anchor pair, including insert-only edits that are perfectly safe. Only
replace/remove on an ancestor can destroy its subtree and make a descendant
anchor unresolvable. Change the signature to accept a dict[str, str]
(anchor → winning operation) and skip the check for insert_after/insert_before.

Finding 1.2 — merge_steps was calling find_step on the already-mutated tree,
so a replacement step that reused a base step ID could be accidentally targeted
by a later edit group (non-deterministic result depending on dict iteration
order). Replace the anchor-group loop with a single-pass _traverse_and_apply
that walks the original tree structure and applies edits as each step is
encountered. Anchors are never re-looked up in a mutated tree.

Design invariant enforced: overlays always apply to the original base tree and
cannot target steps introduced by other overlays. Non-remove edits on non-base
anchors now raise ValueError early.

Also removes apply_edit (no production callers, only tested in isolation) and
its test class — the new traversal inlines the same mechanics without the
find_step round-trip.

Assisted-by: GitHub Copilot (model: claude-sonnet-4.6, autonomous)

Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix(overlays): reject ID trailing newlines and reuse existing .yaml path

Fix two input validation bugs in the overlay layer (Group 2 of copilot
review PR #3557):

1. _validate_safe_id in schema.py used re.match() which anchors only at
   the start of the string, so IDs like 'overlay\n' passed validation
   and could produce newline-containing file paths. Changed to fullmatch()
   so the entire string must satisfy the pattern.

2. workflow_overlay_add always wrote <id>.yml without checking whether
   <id>.yaml already existed. Since the resolver loads both extensions,
   this created two active layers whose edits applied twice. Now uses
   the existing _find_overlay_file() to detect a pre-existing file and
   reuse its path, falling back to .yml only for new overlays.

Tests added for both fixes.

Assisted-by: GitHub Copilot (model: claude-sonnet-4.6, autonomous)

Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix(overlays): fix display order inversion and wrap file-read errors

Finding group 3 from copilot-review-v2.md:

3.1 — Precedence display inverted (overlays/__init__.py)
collect_all_layers used a single-pass sort by (-priority, source_asc),
which placed the *losing* equal-priority source first in the display
while claiming "highest first". Fix: two-pass stable sort — source
descending then priority descending — so the actual winner (last applied
by the composer) rises to the top of the display.

3.2 — Unwrapped file-read errors (overlays/layer_sources.py)
Only yaml.YAMLError was caught around path.read_text(), so an
unreadable or non-UTF-8 overlay produced a raw traceback. Fix: widen
the except clause to (yaml.YAMLError, OSError, UnicodeDecodeError),
matching the pattern used throughout catalog.py.

Tests:
- test_workflow_resolve_equal_priority_winner_shown_first: verifies
  project:zzz (the winner) appears before project:aaa in workflow resolve
  output when both overlays share the same priority.
- tests/workflows/test_overlay_layer_sources.py (new): OSError and
  non-UTF-8 bytes both produce OverlayLoadError, not raw tracebacks.

Assisted-by: GitHub Copilot (model: claude-sonnet-4.6, autonomous)

Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix: rename misleading overlay test

Assisted-by: GitHub Copilot (model: gpt-5.3-codex, autonomous)

Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix: remove EOF blank line in overlay resolver

Assisted-by: GitHub Copilot (model: gpt-5.3-codex, autonomous)

Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>

* Potential fix for pull request finding

Co-authored-by: Copilot Autofix powered by AI <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix: handle overlay read and enumeration errors

Assisted-by: GitHub Copilot (model: gpt-5.3-codex, autonomous)

Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix(overlays): validate resolver workflow IDs

Reject unsafe and reserved workflow IDs before overlay or base sources construct paths, preventing traversal through resolver and engine fallback paths.

Assisted-by: GitHub Copilot (model: GPT-5.6 Sol, autonomous)

Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>

* Potential fix for pull request finding

Co-authored-by: Copilot Autofix powered by AI <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix(overlays): drop _remove_sources_recursively from remove branch

In _traverse_and_apply, the remove branch called _remove_sources_recursively
to clean up attribution entries for the deleted step.  This was inherited from
the old apply_edit loop (c70a5d6) where it was needed because the sources dict
was queried exhaustively.

In the current single-pass design, _build_attribution only traverses the result
list, so stale sources entries for removed steps are never read.  The cleanup
call is therefore unnecessary — and actively harmful when another overlay has
replaced a different step with a new step that reuses the same ID: the pop
clobbers the replacement's attribution entry, causing workflow resolve to report
the surviving step as 'unknown'.

Fix: simply remove the _remove_sources_recursively call from the remove branch.
Add an attribution assertion to the existing reused-ID regression test to catch
this case.

Fixes: r3604242050 (Copilot review finding)

Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Assisted-by: GitHub Copilot (model: claude-sonnet-4.6, autonomous)

* Fix CLI overlay ID validation anchoring

Use fullmatch for CLI workflow/overlay ID validation so trailing newlines are rejected consistently with manifest validation.

Add regression coverage for newline-suffixed workflow and overlay IDs in overlay set-priority.

Assisted-by: GitHub Copilot (model: gpt-5.3-codex, autonomous)

Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix(workflows): validate workflow_id in layer sources before path construction

ProjectOverlaySource.collect() and BaseWorkflowSource.collect() joined
workflow_id directly onto storage paths without validation, enabling
path traversal (e.g. '../../outside') when called outside the
WorkflowResolver.

Add _validate_workflow_id() to layer_sources.py — mirrors the same
_SAFE_ID_PATTERN / _RESERVED_WORKFLOW_IDS check used by WorkflowResolver
in overlays/__init__.py — and call it at the top of both collect()
methods before any path is constructed.

Adds parametrised tests covering unsafe IDs and verifying no filesystem
access occurs for an invalid ID.

Closes review finding r3604772700.

Assisted-by: GitHub Copilot (model: claude-sonnet-4.6, autonomous)

Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix(workflows): align layer source validation with _safe_workflow_id_dir

Plan §4.1 requires that Workflow-ID-Validierung, Symlink-/Containment-
Prüfungen and Fehlerübersetzung must not diverge between workflow
management and the overlay resolver.

My previous fix added ID pattern + reserved-name validation to both
collect() methods but was missing the containment step and the
BaseWorkflowSource directory/file checks that _safe_workflow_id_dir
performs.

Changes:
- Add _ensure_contained_dir(path, root) to layer_sources.py — pure
  domain mirror of overlays/_commands.py::_ensure_contained_dir that
  raises OverlayLoadError instead of typer.Exit
- ProjectOverlaySource.collect(): replace two inline symlink/dir checks
  with _ensure_contained_dir(workflow_overlay_dir, self.overlays_dir),
  adding the missing resolve().relative_to() containment step
- BaseWorkflowSource.collect(): add _ensure_contained_dir on the
  workflow directory, and add workflow.yml symlink check before is_file()

The same logic now lives in three places (workflow CLI, overlay CLI,
layer sources). The DRY extraction to workflows/_validation.py is
deferred to PR 3 per plan §4.1.

Tests: add containment and symlink tests for both sources.

Assisted-by: GitHub Copilot (model: claude-sonnet-4.6, autonomous)

Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>

* Potential fix for pull request finding

Co-authored-by: Copilot Autofix powered by AI <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix(overlays): resolve identity from manifest field, not filename

Align overlay identity resolution with the project-wide convention:
presets use preset.id, extensions use extension.id, workflows use
workflow.id, and workflow steps use step.type_key. Overlays must
derive identity from the manifest id field, not the filename.

Rewrite _find_overlay_file() to scan all YAML files in the overlay
directory and match on the manifest id field, fixing the bug where
enable/disable/remove/set-priority failed when filename != manifest id.

Closes: PR #3557 discussion r3605010197

Assisted-by: opencode-go/qwen3.7-max (autonomous)

* Potential fix for pull request finding

Co-authored-by: Copilot Autofix powered by AI <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix(workflows): make validation behavior consistent across YAML loading paths

Address PR #3557 review finding r3607632921:

- Wrap yaml.YAMLError → ValueError in from_yaml() and from_string() so
  malformed YAML matches the documented exception contract
- Add except ValueError to workflow_info to handle composition errors
  cleanly instead of crashing with a raw traceback
- Remove validate_workflow() from compose() so the resolver path is
  parse-only like all other YAML loading mechanisms; callers validate
  explicitly via engine.validate()
- Update test to reflect new behavior: resolve() returns composed
  definition, caller validates separately

Assisted-by: opencode-go/qwen3.7-max (autonomous)

* fix(overlays): list disabled overlays in management view

Keep disabled overlays visible in workflow overlay list while leaving resolution behavior unchanged.

- add an include_disabled opt-in to overlay source/resolver collection
- use include_disabled=True for workflow overlay list
- add regression tests for list visibility and default filtering

Assisted-by: GitHub Copilot (model: GPT-5.4, autonomous)
Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>

* Potential fix for pull request finding

Co-authored-by: Copilot Autofix powered by AI <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>

* docs: align overlay extends and resolver contract

Assisted-by: GitHub Copilot (model: GPT-5.3-Codex, autonomous)

Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix: use atomic write for overlay file updates to prevent hard-link attack

Replace in-place write_text() calls in workflow_overlay_add() and
_update_overlay_field() with the same mkstemp → write → os.replace()
pattern used by the workflow installer (_stage_workflow_file /
_commit_workflow_file / _discard_staged_workflow_file).

The prior code rejected symlinks and validated path containment, but a
hard-linked destination file passes both checks while sharing an inode
with an external file. write_text() would then truncate and overwrite
that external inode. The atomic staging approach never opens the
existing destination for writing, eliminating the hard-link vector.

Fixes findings r3608669512 and r3608669517 on PR #3557.

Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Assisted-by: GitHub Copilot (model: claude-sonnet-4.6, supervised)

* fix(composer): preserve invalid base definition instead of coercing steps to []

When 'steps' is not a list, returning early with the unmodified
WorkflowDefinition lets validate_workflow surface the proper error
("'steps' must be a list.") to the caller. The previous silent
coercion to [] masked the validation error entirely.

Fixes: https://github.com/github/spec-kit/pull/3557#discussion_r3608669506

Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Assisted-by: GitHub Copilot (model: claude-sonnet-4.6, supervised)

* fix: align workflow overlay priority semantics

Assisted-by: GitHub Copilot (model: GPT-5.6 Terra, autonomous)

Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix: validate overlay priority presentation

Assisted-by: GitHub Copilot (model: GPT-5.6 Terra, autonomous)

Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix: catch OverflowError in normalize_priority for float infinity values

YAML values like `priority: .inf` parse to float('inf'), causing
int() to raise OverflowError. This broke validate_overlay_yaml()'s
'validation never raises' contract. Adding OverflowError to the
except clause makes it fall back to the default priority (10),
consistent with other invalid value handling.

Assisted-by: GitHub Copilot (model: claude-sonnet-4.6, autonomous)
Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: Markus <markus@example.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot Autofix powered by AI <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-07-21 08:35:25 -05:00
2025-10-17 13:04:27 -07:00
2025-12-04 11:50:36 -08:00

Spec Kit Logo

🌱 Spec Kit

Define what to build before building it — with any AI coding agent.

An open source toolkit for building high-quality software with any AI coding agent — a ready-to-use spec-driven process (or bring your own), endlessly extensible, community-driven, and built for your whole organization.

Latest Release GitHub stars License Documentation


Table of Contents

🤔 What is Spec-Driven Development?

Spec-Driven Development flips the script on traditional software development. For decades, code has been king — specifications were just scaffolding we built and discarded once the "real work" of coding began. Spec-Driven Development changes this: specifications become executable, directly generating working implementations rather than just guiding them.

Get Started

1. Install Specify CLI

Requires uv (install uv). Replace vX.Y.Z with the latest release tag from Releases — keep the leading v (for example, v0.12.11, not 0.12.11):

uv tool install specify-cli --from git+https://github.com/github/spec-kit.git@vX.Y.Z

Prefer installing from PyPI? The specify-cli package is also published there:

uv tool install specify-cli

See the Installation Guide for alternative methods, verification, upgrade, and troubleshooting.

2. Initialize a project

specify init my-project --integration copilot
cd my-project

To check for updates or upgrade the installed CLI, use the self-management commands. See the Upgrade Guide for detailed scenarios and customization options.

# Check whether a newer release is available (read-only — does not modify anything)
specify self check

# Preview what would run, without actually upgrading
specify self upgrade --dry-run

# Upgrade in place to the latest stable release (auto-detects uv tool vs pipx install)
specify self upgrade

# Or pin a specific release tag (replace vX.Y.Z[suffix] with your desired release tag)
specify self upgrade --tag vX.Y.Z[suffix]

Bare specify self upgrade executes immediately, matching the no-prompt behavior of commands like pip install -U and npm update. For uv tool installs, it runs uv tool install specify-cli --force --from <git ref> under the hood so pinned release tags work, including dev, alpha/beta/rc, or build metadata suffixes. uvx (ephemeral) runs and source checkouts are detected and produce path-specific guidance instead of running an installer. Set SPECIFY_UPGRADE_TIMEOUT_SECS to cap how long the installer subprocess may run (default: no timeout — interrupt with Ctrl+C if needed).

3. Establish project principles

Launch your coding agent in the project directory. Most agents expose spec-kit as /speckit.* slash commands; Codex CLI in skills mode uses $speckit-* instead; GitHub Copilot CLI uses /agents to select the agent or address it directly in a prompt.

Use the /speckit.constitution command to create your project's governing principles and development guidelines that will guide all subsequent development.

/speckit.constitution Create principles focused on code quality, testing standards, user experience consistency, and performance requirements

4. Create the spec

Use the /speckit.specify command to describe what you want to build. Focus on the what and why, not the tech stack.

/speckit.specify Build an application that can help me organize my photos in separate photo albums. Albums are grouped by date and can be re-organized by dragging and dropping on the main page. Albums are never in other nested albums. Within each album, photos are previewed in a tile-like interface.

5. Create a technical implementation plan

Use the /speckit.plan command to provide your tech stack and architecture choices.

/speckit.plan The application uses Vite with minimal number of libraries. Use vanilla HTML, CSS, and JavaScript as much as possible. Images are not uploaded anywhere and metadata is stored in a local SQLite database.

6. Break down into tasks

Use /speckit.tasks to create an actionable task list from your implementation plan.

/speckit.tasks

7. Execute implementation

Use /speckit.implement to execute all tasks and build your feature according to the plan.

/speckit.implement

For detailed step-by-step instructions, see our comprehensive guide.

📽️ Video Overview

Want to see Spec Kit in action? Watch our video overview!

Spec Kit video header

🌍 Community

Explore community-contributed resources on the Spec Kit docs site:

  • Extensions — commands, hooks, and capabilities
  • Presets — template and terminology overrides
  • Bundles — role and team stacks composed from existing components
  • Walkthroughs — end-to-end SDD scenarios
  • Friends — projects that extend or build on Spec Kit

Note

Community contributions are independently created and maintained by their respective authors. Review source code before installation and use at your own discretion.

Want to contribute? See the Extension Publishing Guide, the Presets Publishing Guide, or the Community Bundles guide.

🤖 Supported AI Coding Agent Integrations

Spec Kit works with 30+ AI coding agents — both CLI tools and IDE-based assistants. See the full list with notes and usage details in the Supported AI Coding Agent Integrations guide.

Run specify integration list to see all available integrations in your installed version.

Available Slash Commands

After running specify init, your AI coding agent will have access to these slash commands for structured development. For integrations that support skills mode, passing --integration <agent> --integration-options="--skills" installs agent skills instead of slash-command prompt files.

Core Commands

Essential commands for the Spec-Driven Development workflow:

Command Agent Skill Description
/speckit.constitution speckit-constitution Create or update project governing principles and development guidelines
/speckit.specify speckit-specify Define what you want to build (requirements and user stories)
/speckit.plan speckit-plan Create technical implementation plans with your chosen tech stack
/speckit.tasks speckit-tasks Generate actionable task lists for implementation
/speckit.taskstoissues speckit-taskstoissues Convert generated task lists into GitHub issues for tracking and execution
/speckit.implement speckit-implement Execute all tasks to build the feature according to the plan
/speckit.converge speckit-converge Assess the codebase against spec/plan/tasks and append remaining work as new tasks

Optional Commands

Additional commands for enhanced quality and validation:

Command Agent Skill Description
/speckit.clarify speckit-clarify Clarify underspecified areas (recommended before /speckit.plan; formerly /quizme)
/speckit.analyze speckit-analyze Cross-artifact consistency & coverage analysis (run after /speckit.tasks, before /speckit.implement)
/speckit.checklist speckit-checklist Generate custom quality checklists that validate requirements completeness, clarity, and consistency (like "unit tests for English")

🔧 Specify CLI Reference

For full command details, options, and examples, see the CLI Reference.

🧩 Making Spec Kit Your Own: Extensions & Presets

Spec Kit can be tailored to your needs through two complementary systems — extensions and presets — plus project-local overrides for one-off adjustments:

Priority Component Type Location
⬆ 1 Project-Local Overrides .specify/templates/overrides/
2 Presets — Customize core & extensions .specify/presets/templates/
3 Extensions — Add new capabilities .specify/extensions/templates/
⬇ 4 Spec Kit Core — Built-in SDD commands & templates .specify/templates/
  • Templates are resolved at runtime — Spec Kit walks the stack top-down and uses the first match.
  • Project-local overrides (.specify/templates/overrides/) let you make one-off adjustments for a single project without creating a full preset.
  • Extension/preset commands are applied at install time — when you run specify extension add or specify preset add, command files are written into agent directories (e.g., .claude/commands/).
  • If multiple presets or extensions provide the same command, the highest-priority version wins. On removal, the next-highest-priority version is restored automatically.
  • If no overrides or customizations exist, Spec Kit uses its core defaults.

Extensions — Add New Capabilities

Use extensions when you need functionality that goes beyond Spec Kit's core. Extensions introduce new commands and templates — for example, adding domain-specific workflows that are not covered by the built-in SDD commands, integrating with external tools, or adding entirely new development phases. They expand what Spec Kit can do.

# Search available extensions
specify extension search

# Install an extension
specify extension add <extension-name>

For example, extensions could add Jira integration, post-implementation code review, V-Model test traceability, or project health diagnostics.

See the Extensions reference for the full command guide. Browse the community extensions for what's available.

Presets — Customize Existing Workflows

Use presets when you want to change how Spec Kit works without adding new capabilities. Presets override the templates and commands that ship with the core and with installed extensions — for example, enforcing a compliance-oriented spec format, using domain-specific terminology, or applying organizational standards to plans and tasks. They customize the artifacts and instructions that Spec Kit and its extensions produce.

# Search available presets
specify preset search

# Install a preset
specify preset add <preset-name>

For example, presets could restructure spec templates to require regulatory traceability, adapt the workflow to fit the methodology you use (e.g., Agile, Kanban, Waterfall, jobs-to-be-done, or domain-driven design), add mandatory security review gates to plans, enforce test-first task ordering, or localize the entire workflow to a different language. The pirate-speak demo shows just how deep the customization can go. Multiple presets can be stacked with priority ordering.

See the Presets reference for the full command guide, including resolution order and priority stacking.

📦 Bundles: Role-Based Setups

Extensions and presets are individual building blocks. A bundle packages a curated set of them — extensions, presets, steps, and workflows — into a single, versioned, role-oriented setup so a whole team persona (product manager, business analyst, security researcher, developer, …) can be provisioned with one command.

A bundle is described by a hand-written bundle.yml manifest. It pins each component to a version and, optionally, targets a specific integration; a bundle with no integration is agnostic and inherits whatever integration the project already uses.

# Discover bundles in the active catalog stack
specify bundle search [<query>]

# Inspect the exact component set a bundle will add (equals what install does)
specify bundle info <bundle-id>

# Install a bundle's full component set in one operation
specify bundle install <bundle-id>

# See what's installed, then update or remove non-destructively
specify bundle list
specify bundle update <bundle-id>     # or --all
specify bundle remove <bundle-id>     # removes only this bundle's components

Bundles resolve from a priority-ordered catalog stack (project > user > built-in). Each source carries an install policy: install-allowed sources can be installed from, while discovery-only sources are visible in search/info but refuse installation. Manage the stack with specify bundle catalog list|add|remove.

Authors validate and package bundles locally. Distribution is hosting the built artifact and adding a catalog source; community bundle submissions use the Bundle Submission issue template so required component catalogs and install evidence can be reviewed:

specify bundle validate --path ./my-bundle      # structural + reference checks
specify bundle build --path ./my-bundle         # produce a versioned .zip artifact

Four ready-to-read example manifests live under examples/bundles/ (product manager, business analyst, security researcher, developer).

Key guarantees: info shows exactly what install adds (transparency); installs are idempotent and confined to the project root; remove never touches components another installed bundle still needs; and all consume/author commands work offline against local or pinned sources.

When to Use Which

Goal Use
Add a brand-new command or workflow Extension
Customize the format of specs, plans, or tasks Preset
Integrate an external tool or service Extension
Enforce organizational or regulatory standards Preset
Ship reusable domain-specific templates Either — presets for template overrides, extensions for templates bundled with new commands
Provision a complete role-based setup in one command Bundle

📚 Core Philosophy

Spec-Driven Development is a structured process that emphasizes:

  • Intent-driven development where specifications define the "what" before the "how"
  • Rich specification creation using guardrails and organizational principles
  • Multi-step refinement rather than one-shot code generation from prompts
  • Heavy reliance on advanced AI model capabilities for specification interpretation

🌟 Development Phases

Phase Focus Key Activities
0-to-1 Development ("Greenfield") Generate from scratch
  • Start with high-level requirements
  • Generate specifications
  • Plan implementation steps
  • Build production-ready applications
Creative Exploration Parallel implementations
  • Explore diverse solutions
  • Support multiple technology stacks & architectures
  • Experiment with UX patterns
Iterative Enhancement ("Brownfield") Brownfield modernization
  • Add features iteratively
  • Modernize legacy systems
  • Adapt processes

For existing projects, keep Spec Kit tooling updates separate from feature artifact evolution: refresh managed project files when upgrading, and update specs/ artifacts when intended behavior changes. The Evolving Specs guide describes the recommended brownfield loop.

🎯 Experimental Goals

Our research and experimentation focus on:

Technology independence

  • Create applications using diverse technology stacks
  • Validate the hypothesis that Spec-Driven Development is a process not tied to specific technologies, programming languages, or frameworks

Enterprise constraints

  • Demonstrate mission-critical application development
  • Incorporate organizational constraints (cloud providers, tech stacks, engineering practices)
  • Support enterprise design systems and compliance requirements

User-centric development

  • Build applications for different user cohorts and preferences
  • Support various development approaches (from vibe-coding to AI-native development)

Creative & iterative processes

  • Validate the concept of parallel implementation exploration
  • Provide robust iterative feature development workflows
  • Extend processes to handle upgrades and modernization tasks

🔧 Prerequisites

If you encounter issues with an agent, please open an issue so we can refine the integration.

📖 Learn More


💬 Support

For support, please open a GitHub issue. We welcome bug reports, feature requests, and questions about using Spec-Driven Development.

🙏 Acknowledgements

This project is heavily influenced by and based on the work and research of John Lam.

📄 License

This project is licensed under the terms of the MIT open source license. Please refer to the LICENSE file for the full terms.

Description
No description provided
Readme MIT Cite this repository 264 MiB
Languages
Python 96.5%
Shell 1.8%
PowerShell 1.7%